Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-12 Thread KB
>>>>>>>>> I have setup a very simple topology and not using ObjectMapper or >>>>>>>>> any other Jackson classes. Although we are using jackson libraries >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jackson-core-2.6.2 &g

Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-11 Thread Jungtaek Lim
gt; >>>>>>>> Jackson-core-2.6.2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jackson-databind-2.4.5 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and these versions not changed between Storm version 0.9

Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-11 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
gt;>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and these versions not changed between Storm version 0.9 and 1.0.0. >>>>>>>> Please let me know if you make any progress on this issue. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Meanwhile w

Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-11 Thread Jungtaek Lim
;>> and these versions not changed between Storm version 0.9 and 1.0.0. >>>>>>> Please let me know if you make any progress on this issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Meanwhile would it help if we raise a jira issue to track the >>>>

Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-11 Thread KB
t;> >>>>>> >>>>>> Meanwhile would it help if we raise a jira issue to track the problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please advice. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, &g

Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-10 Thread Jungtaek Lim
hanks, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:17 PM, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> we had a similar issue (see >>>>&

Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-10 Thread KB
>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:17 PM, wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> we had a similar issue (see >>>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/storm-user/201604.mbox/%3C645fd7

Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-09 Thread Jungtaek Lim
be0ac1f1e41a0f9393b%40SG001741.corproot.net%3E >>>> ). So far, we have not been able to solve it, but we currently have a >>>> suspicion that it might be related to the Jackson ObjectMapper we use. Can >>>> I check whether you also use that? >>>> >&g

Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-09 Thread Jungtaek Lim
t it might be related to the Jackson ObjectMapper we use. Can >>> I check whether you also use that? >>> >>> >>> >>> With kind regards >>> >>> >>> >>> Samuel >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* KB

Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-09 Thread KB
gt; >> With kind regards >> >> >> >> Samuel >> >> >> >> *From:* KB [mailto:jam.develo...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Dienstag, 3. Mai 2016 18:43 >> *To:* user@storm.apache.org >> *Subject:* Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue >&

Re: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-04 Thread KB
> > > > Samuel > > > > *From:* KB [mailto:jam.develo...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Dienstag, 3. Mai 2016 18:43 > *To:* user@storm.apache.org > *Subject:* Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue > > > > Hello, > > > > We have recently upgraded to Storm

RE: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-03 Thread Samuel.Bucheli
use. Can I check whether you also use that? With kind regards Samuel From: KB [mailto:jam.develo...@gmail.com] Sent: Dienstag, 3. Mai 2016 18:43 To: user@storm.apache.org Subject: Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue Hello, We have recently upgraded to Storm 1.0.0. Our system was in

Storm 1.0.0 upgrade Serialization issue

2016-05-03 Thread KB
Hello, We have recently upgraded to Storm 1.0.0. Our system was in production for long with Storm 0.9. Our topology is not getting loaded with this upgrade. It was working fine with 0.9. I am getting following error: ---