Or you can use Decorators :
display:table name=list
decorator=mypackage.decorator.MyDecorator
display:column titleKey=colName
property=attrNameNotInBean/
/display:table
public class MyDecorator extends TableDecorator {
public
Hello,
I have read your conversion here,
I am having a strange problem in my converter.
case 1:-
JSP
s:textfield name=myDate/
classname-conversion.properties
myDate = tutorial.MyTypeConverter
case 2:-
JSP
s:textfield name=user.myDate/
Seems like the 2.1.1-SNAPSHOT portlet app bundles servlet-api-2.3.jar.
Try removing it and see if that helps.
Nils-H
On 11/1/07, Brian Relph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is the sample webapp downloaded from
Hello,
I am using the following tag for uploading text files:
s:file name=myDoc accept=text/plain /
I expected it to recognise wrong content types, but it accepts any files
I upload. What might be the problem here?
I tried this with Struts 2.0.9 and 2.0.11.
Best,
Anton
2007/11/2, lbastil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you for this hint, but in this case I don't think so.
I am already use tiles for the overall page structure, but for this
minor substructures I don't want to use a kind of tiles sub-hierarchy.
Ok I think I understood: so you want a piece of code
You can still create custom tags in Java if you're
dead-set on it.
Or you can use JSP 2.0 tags, where your tag
implementation is in JSP.
There are a lot of ways of doing what you're trying to
do. I don't know why you're opposed to using tiles,
particularly if you're already invested in it.
d.
Thank you for this hint, but in this case I don't think so.
I am already use tiles for the overall page structure, but for this
minor substructures I don't want to use a kind of tiles sub-hierarchy.
Is there no equivalence to former custom tag?
Something like a ftl-script I can apply
Thinking on it a bit, Basti, I think that your best friend would be Sitemesh:
http://www.opensymphony.com/sitemesh/
If you have the same structure (or a small number of structures)
across all the application, this is the easier approach.
Struts 2 has a Sitemesh plugin too:
2007/11/2, Rod Bollinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tiles (and in Struts 1? Tiles) :-)
And for the newcoming Struts 1.4, Tiles 2 :-)
Sorry for the advertisement :-P
Antonio
Tiles (and in Struts 1? Tiles) :-)
http://struts.apache.org/1.x/struts-tiles/
-Rod
-Original Message-
From: lbastil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 10:43
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: [s2] templating approach / own tag?
Hi,
I want to archive the
2007/11/2, lbastil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I want to archive the following:
I noticed in my page code often this redundant structure:
(dynamic parts in [])
div id=headerTitle
[Header Section Name]
/div
div id=headerContent
[
... various different content, tables, ... and so on
]
Hi,
I want to archive the following:
I noticed in my page code often this redundant structure:
(dynamic parts in [])
div id=headerTitle
[Header Section Name]
/div
div id=headerContent
[
... various different content, tables, ... and so on
]
/div
Now I would like to create some parameterized
unfortunately that does not solve the problems. the readme states that the
app is not ready to run because there are portal-container specific
configurations that are required - it comes packaged with jboss and liferay
configurations. i find it odd that previous versions of the app can run
Hi everyone,
I've found the source off my problem.
It seams that if you want to format a value in s:textfield tag you have to:
s:text id=myFieldValueID name=format.numbers:param name=value
value=myFieldValue //s:text
s:textfield id=txtmyFieldValue name=myFieldValue
value=%{myFieldValueID}/
I also submitted an email yesterday related to type conversion and your
observation below was very helpful. The fact that your case 2 doesn't
work also describes my problem (submitted as interceptor and converter
cycle).
For now I guess I'll go with case 1 at the Action class level in order
to
In our previous WebWork app we were not using ModelDriven and just
relying on OGNL assignment...
* We ensure our action provides a getter for the domain object
private Account account;
public Account getAccount();
* We ensure html fieldnames include both the domain object name and the
--- Gary Affonso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And that does it. Direct model injection. Easy.
Technically, no, it's indirected by one level.
*All* ModelDriven does is push the model on to the
stack so it's available at the top level. AFAIK
there's no compelling reason to do that other than
saving
Hi Anton
which theme is specified in your s:head tag?
Martin-
- Original Message -
From: Anton Pussep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List user@struts.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 6:03 AM
Subject: Struts 2, file tag, accept attribute not working?
Hello,
I
There is no s:head tag, since I am not using Ajax. Thus it should be the
default xhtml.
Best,
Anton
Martin Gainty wrote:
Hi Anton
which theme is specified in your s:head tag?
Martin-
- Original Message -
From: Anton Pussep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Besides the simplified view references, I've used the level of indirection to
allow for a dynamic model on a single action class that implements a number of
related actions. In my case the action configuration sets a static property
that defines the model property. The getModel implemenation
We are currently using Struts 1.2.7.
In our application if a user attempts to access an interface that they
need to be logged into to use but are not currently logged in they are
redirected to a login interface. The url for the original interface
they were trying to access is passed as a
Jon Wilmoth wrote:
Besides the simplified view references, I've used the level of
indirection to allow for a dynamic model on a single action class
that implements a number of related actions. In my case the action
configuration sets a static property that defines the model property.
The
Dave Newton wrote:
--- Gary Affonso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And that does it. Direct model injection. Easy.
Technically, no, it's indirected by one level.
*All* ModelDriven does is push the model on to the
stack so it's available at the top level. AFAIK
there's no compelling reason to do
I am extending to FreemarkerManager to customize the tempalte:
@Override
protected Configuration createConfiguration(ServletContext
servletContext) throws TemplateException {
Configuration config = super.createConfiguration(servletContext);
ClassTemplateLoader ctl = new
For the conversion to work with user.myDate, we need to create a properties
file named User-conversion.properties and locate it in the directory
where the user class resides (assuming your User class is an
org.appfuse.model.User). Then inside that file, we have to put:
mydate =
I refer you to the Acegi Security project which does this. They have a
SavedRequest class which contains a copy of the request parameters and such
of the original request. This object is stored in the session. When the
login succeeds, the SavedRequest is then extracted into a new request object
26 matches
Mail list logo
