i would suggest including handler attribute e.g.
function handler(widget,node) {
node.innerHtml="new content goes here";
}
i would suggest reading and studying XMLHttpRequest for an understanding of
Asynchronous Request Model as implemented by AJAX..
Saludos Cordiales,
Martin Gainty
___
Hi,
The selected option's value can be retrieved via the property attribute in
tag . Is there a way to retrieve the selected option's label
via tag or tag?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/s1%3A-%3Chtml%3Aselect...-%3E-and-its-selected-option%27s-label-tp276630
Hi all,
I would like your advise for a problem I'm facing with sx:div.
I'm using JDK 1.5, Struts 2.1.6 and Firefox 3.0.18 under Ubuntu.
In our application, we have a central sx:div in the Main action page where
the content is displayed. It is declared as follows:
Then,
Go ahead and file a jira. Better yet, file one with a patch and unit
test. I don't know if we would make escaping the default (it might
break backward compatibility). But it is definitely worth putting in
the next release.
-Wes
On 2/19/10, John Orr wrote:
> Thanks for the cleaner code - that is
Struts 2 documentaion at *
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/building-the-framework-from-source.html*
implies (at the bottom of the page) that only java 1.5 is required. But when
I deploy my app to a tomcat 5.5.27 server using jdk 1.5.0_20, I get the
UnsupportedClassVersionError below. Am I right i
Have to use ac.getValueStack().set(key,value) instead.
This fixed the issue.
-Original Message-
From: CRANFORD, CHRIS [mailto:chris.cranf...@setech.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:11 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Interceptor
Correct it was a typo.
I have modified
Correct it was a typo.
I have modified my Interceptor with the following internal class:
private class TimerPreResultListener
implements PreResultListener {
private long started;
private Logger log = LogManager.getLogger(TimerInterceptor.class);
public TimerPreResultListener() {
starte
Chris,
Your algorithm with Calendars is realyl complicated, can't you simply
use System.currentTimeMillis() ?
Then, can you also add a log to the interceptor so that you can log
the value before you put it in the value stack ?
It will not solve your pb but it will make things more clear and will
h
Yes, I think this is exactly the issue raised in my last post. Your
result is being processed before the lines that follow the action
invocation. Insert a PreResultListener and it can do the job of
updating.
(BTW, your method is called interceptor() but it should be Intercept()
- I'm guessing that
My RequestTimerInterceptor is very basic and looks just like this below. What
I find is that if I use a tag in my JSP, the action context
parameter is being set to 0 but the update at the end of the interceptor isn't
applied.
What have I missed?
public String interceptor(ActionInvocation ac
I think this case gets a little more complicated because you want the
timer data to be available to your result. If you simply wait for your
call to ActionInvocation.invoke() to return, then your result will
already have been processed. So you need to use your interceptor to
set a PreResultListener
Look at ParameterRemoverInterceptor for example, you can access the
action context like this :
ActionContext ac = invocation.getInvocationContext();
And then you can set values in the value stack. Didn't test it but should work.
Cimballi
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:10 AM, CRANFORD, CHRIS
wrote:
Is it possible to set a value in the request or valuestack from an
interceptor that contains the total time it took for the action to be
invoked and executed? I have a requirement to show this on the JSP page
and didn't know if I could do this within the Interceptor or if I have
to do this in my b
Aaah, dates!
Add an s:date and associate with the textfield, like:
I'm not sure if both tags need the "name" or not - post your findings.
fireapple wrote:
>
> Does that mean I have to create something like:
>
> public String getStartDateStr()
> {
> ...
> }
>
> to do this?
>
> I
Thanks for the cleaner code - that is an improvement, and I'll use that idiom.
I agree that generally is intended for displaying safe text.
However the use case "Hello, {0}" has to be pretty common, when
something like a user name is inserted. Also the ability to access
OGNL inside resource bundl
Does that mean I have to create something like:
public String getStartDateStr()
{
...
}
to do this?
I don't want to use this because if I use this getter, I have to create a
setter for this since user can edit the date.
Any other options? Thanks
Brian Thompson-5 wrote:
>
> Just add
A slightly cleaner way would be like this:
I think in most cases is used for displaying "safe" text that
the app either supplies or generates.
Obviously if you do use it to echo user supplied data you need to be careful.
It would be nice to have a flag like you suggest however it might be
diffi
17 matches
Mail list logo