http://struts.apache.org/2.3.1/struts2-plugins/struts2-json-plugin/apidocs/org/apache/struts2/json/annotations/JSONFieldBridge.html
I understand what you mean, furthermore I found a workaround for it:
@JSONFieldBridge(impl = StringBridge.class)
public ENUM_TYPE getType() {
return type;
}
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin:http://www.l
But some people use `toString()` as a generic "let's make this
human-readable" method, so it could return essentially anything. I mean,
it'd be escaped, so legal JSON, but I'm not sure that's what would be
expected.
I'm wary.
d.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara
wrote:
> Hi a
Hi all,
while I was trying to jsonify an enum, I realized that the json writer uses
the value of the name property in order to serialize an enum (see
http://s.apache.org/Usi - row 286).
Although it looks like there was a general consensus on the use the name
properties (see http://s.apache.org/XRm)
4 matches
Mail list logo