Am 23.09.2013 20:32, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
2013/9/23 Paweł Wielgus poulw...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I'm using DMI to call input method extensively,
almost in every Edit*Action.
I call it with ParamsPrepareParams stack.
I fully understand that allowing DMI is a security problem.
But maybe some kind
Hi all,
I'm using DMI to call input method extensively,
almost in every Edit*Action.
I call it with ParamsPrepareParams stack.
I fully understand that allowing DMI is a security problem.
But maybe some kind of balance could be achevied.
White listing with annotations would not be
2013/9/24 Christoph Nenning christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net:
Yeah, I like the idea of strict-DMI. Right now I could not get it working
with the convention pulgin, can investigate next week.
That's why I want to have programmable configuration in XWork and then
XML or Convention configuration via
Yeah, I like the idea of strict-DMI. Right now I could not get it
working
with the convention pulgin, can investigate next week.
That's why I want to have programmable configuration in XWork and then
XML or Convention configuration via plugins - there strict path how to
add new
2013/9/24 Christoph Nenning christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net:
Yeah, I like the idea of strict-DMI. Right now I could not get it
working
with the convention pulgin, can investigate next week.
That's why I want to have programmable configuration in XWork and then
XML or Convention configuration
Yeah, I like the idea of strict-DMI. Right now I could not get it
working
with the convention pulgin, can investigate next week.
That's why I want to have programmable configuration in XWork and
then
XML or Convention configuration via plugins - there strict path how
to
add new
2013/9/24 Christoph Nenning christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net:
But still: method:add works while !add does not.
If you could prepare a small demo app, I'd like investigate that.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
But still: method:add works while !add does not.
If you could prepare a small demo app, I'd like investigate that.
I can do so next week, sorry for the delay
This Email was scanned by Sophos Anti Virus
2013/9/24 Christoph Nenning christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net:
But still: method:add works while !add does not.
If you could prepare a small demo app, I'd like investigate that.
I can do so next week, sorry for the delay
No problem, I'm busy too ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122
2013/9/20 Lukasz Lenart [lukaszlen...@apache.org]:
I don't think the setter overridding is the problem because I have also
tried injecting into a different method (setObjectTypeDeterminerOverride)
which didn't work either. Injecting the container doesn't work either
because all injections into
I've been looking for the cdi-plugin, expecting it to be in the
struts-2.3.15.2-all.zip download but its not there. I couldn't find it in
the 2.3.15.1 download either. A co-worker said he found it in a maven
repository but that he couldn't find the md5 hashes to verify the download.
Any reason
See Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4206
I've added the cdi plugin to the assembly pom.xml. So with next version
2.3.16 also the CDI Plugin should be included.
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter:
Hello,
I have an Action that receives a parameter *email *on a bean *event*. So
basically the parameter is send to the server with name *
event.email=jlmagcatgmail.com*'. The bean and the parameter are created
correctly, so this part works ok. Now I want to validate the input using
annotations.
13 matches
Mail list logo
