Re: Grouping same type validators

Sorry, this is the right one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4340 El lun 05 may 2014 18:39:59 CEST, Antonio Sánchez escribió: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3993 El lun 05 may 2014 13:34:51 CEST, Lukasz Lenart escribió: Sure thing, but it will be rather postponed till 2.5

Re: Grouping same type validators

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3993 El lun 05 may 2014 13:34:51 CEST, Lukasz Lenart escribió: Sure thing, but it will be rather postponed till 2.5 2014-05-05 13:31 GMT+02:00 Antonio Sánchez : Would it worth the while to post an enhancement request? El lun 05 may 2014 10:17:09 CEST,

[ANN] Struts 2.3.16.3 GA release available - security fix

The Apache Struts group is pleased to announce that Struts 2.3.16.3 is available as a "General Availability" release.The GA designation is our highest quality grade. Apache Struts 2 is an elegant, extensible framework for creating enterprise-ready Java web applications. The framework is designed t

Re: Struts zero-day vulnerability

Here you have more details [1] and just to point it out - Struts 1 reached EOL [2] and no further development is expected! Consider migration to Struts2 or any other modern framework. [1] http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Research-Blog/Protect-your-Struts1-applications/ba-p/6463188#.U2d8va

Struts zero-day vulnerability

Hello, We use struts version 1.2.2 and commons-file upload version 1.1.1. It is not clear from this notification if these versions are impacted. 1. Can anyone confirm if these versions or affected? 2. If they are affected, what can be done? Should we upgrade to Struts 2.x? The n

Re: Grouping same type validators

Sure thing, but it will be rather postponed till 2.5 2014-05-05 13:31 GMT+02:00 Antonio Sánchez : > Would it worth the while to post an enhancement request? > > El lun 05 may 2014 10:17:09 CEST, Lukasz Lenart escribió: >> >> It isn't supported and I don't see simple way to achieve this. >> >> 2014

Re: Grouping same type validators

Would it worth the while to post an enhancement request? El lun 05 may 2014 10:17:09 CEST, Lukasz Lenart escribió: It isn't supported and I don't see simple way to achieve this. 2014-05-03 23:33 GMT+02:00 Antonio Sánchez : Hello. in a middle sized application there may be hundreds of required

Re: want to get help with an issue in upgrading struts to 2.3.16.2

Did you upgrade all the libs? 2014-05-05 10:17 GMT+02:00 liangyu105 : > Hello, > > I'm upgrading from Struts 2.3.15.1 to Struts 2.3.16.2. but encounter a > problem which i have search on web a lot of time but still don't have a > clue , i am a newer in struts , would you kindly help me to solve

want to get help with an issue in upgrading struts to 2.3.16.2

Hello, I'm upgrading from Struts 2.3.15.1 to Struts 2.3.16.2. but encounter a problem which i have search on web a lot of time but still don't have a clue , i am a newer in struts , would you kindly help me to solve it ? thanks! from the tomcat log , it gives : * Unable to load bean com.opensy

Re: Grouping same type validators

It isn't supported and I don't see simple way to achieve this. 2014-05-03 23:33 GMT+02:00 Antonio Sánchez : > Hello. > > in a middle sized application there may be hundreds of required fields, and > maybe dozens of some other validator type, which are all very verbose to > define. > > For instance

Re: Grouping same type validators

I don't think so. That code validates a filed named person.lastNameAndFirstName for a sequence of blank separated words. I'm asking for for an abbreviated syntax for defining required validations, or once for all defining validations that will be present all along the project. MG> person.