Re: interfaces with default methods on actions

2016-06-12 Thread Adam Brin
It would be great if we could remove ASM3. My naive investigation suggests that both ASM 3 and ASM 5 share some of the same clases in the same package structure which are likely the cause of some of our issues. If it really is that one class, it shouldn't be to complex. Regarding Spring and ASM

RE: interfaces with default methods on actions

2016-06-12 Thread Martin Gainty
> From: lukaszlen...@apache.org > Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:31:26 +0200 > Subject: Re: interfaces with default methods on actions > To: user@struts.apache.org > > 2016-06-12 6:46 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert : > > Is there still any reason to still use asm3? > > Or should we

Re: interfaces with default methods on actions

2016-06-12 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2016-06-12 6:46 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert : > Is there still any reason to still use asm3? > Or should we change this with 2.5.x? Yes, we should drop ASM3 and the Java8 plugin as well and switch to ASM5. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/

Re: interfaces with default methods on actions

2016-06-12 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2016-06-12 6:46 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert : > Is there still any reason to still use asm3? > Or should we change this with 2.5.x? > > Best Regards > > Johannes > Am 11.06.2016 11:28 vorm. schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" : > >> 2016-06-10 19:22 GMT+02:00 Adam

Re: interfaces with default methods on actions

2016-06-12 Thread Johannes Geppert
Is there still any reason to still use asm3? Or should we change this with 2.5.x? Best Regards Johannes Am 11.06.2016 11:28 vorm. schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" : > 2016-06-10 19:22 GMT+02:00 Adam Brin : > > I’ll give it a try without the java8