Tiles and sitemesh are for traditional (non - single page applications)
development. Tiles has performance advantages over sitemesh. I don't think
the OP should experience any blockers with respect to tiles migration and
will gain version 3 benefits as well.
On Wed., Mar. 25, 2020, 10:40 a.m. M Hu
Hii
Got the differencea in here
http://tiles.apache.org/framework/tutorial/pattern.html
I have to try using tiles. When i need a Single Page Application approach,
currently i use one single jsp page that have iframe in it. So the page
literally have header, footer, sidebar, and iframe for body co
Hii
I am not use tiles before, it seems like site mesh. Currently we use
sitemesh to decorate page based on url. I checked the tiles its retired. I
suggest you to use sitemesh. I dont know what is plus using tiles. With
sitemesh you don't even use plugin in struts.
Thank you...
On Mon, Mar 2
Thanks for your answer!
The logic is tied to a human decision.
Yes, that were my first approaches too, I'm looking for other options.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:45 AM Dave Newton wrote:
> What's the specific use case? What's the logic that determines availability
> (e.g., is this an auth/auth is
What's the specific use case? What's the logic that determines availability
(e.g., is this an auth/auth issue)?
An interceptor or action base class would be my first approach.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:39 Matias Rodriguez
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking for a clean way to disable/enable (at runti
Hi!
I'm looking for a clean way to disable/enable (at runtime) specific
namespace / specific action hierarchy. An option is to use an Interceptor,
but: is there another *standard *way to do this? With *disable* I mean, for
example, a HTTP 404 server response.
Thanks!
6 matches
Mail list logo
