Re: Display a form without using .do

2005-02-20 Thread J Q
Hmm... Of course, the next question should probably be raised if it's a good idea to base your security model on paths that don't even exist in reality... It seems a bit odd to me to place your trust on how the URI string will be handled internally. If there isn't such a path as .../protected/...,

Re: [OT]Struts Application + Eclipse + NitroX

2005-02-18 Thread J Q
Yes, it actually does with standard Eclipse. It's plugin just like any other Eclipse plugin. During the installation you can choose to install it standalone (pre-bundled with its own Eclipse 3.x) or choose your existing Eclipse installation and it will simply put a plugin in there. The best way to

Re: Display a form without using .do

2005-02-18 Thread J Q
My impression was that Struts 1.2 picks up whatever mapping you use in your web.xml to map requests to the ActionServlet. So, if you map it to /something/* you will be able to invoke your action with this url: www.url.com/webapp/something/selectServices Anyone please correct me if I am wrong.

ActionMessage without using a key from application.properties

2005-02-17 Thread J Q
Is there a way to construct a completely custom message without using a key from application.properties? ActionMessage constructor seems to insist on having a key that would be mapped to the application.properties. Thanks, JQ. -

Re: RequestProcessor instantiation doubt ( in .NET)

2005-02-14 Thread J Q
Leandro, You might want to post this on the struts-dev mailing list. You might get more help there. JQ. On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:37:38 -0300 (ART), Leandro Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all. > The last days I've been working in a Struts like > framework for .NET. I guess most people that w

Re: Struts In Action - Still up to date?

2005-02-13 Thread J Q
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:22:01 -0700, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > very soon Very soon as in months or weeks? How do you know this and could you be a bit more specific? What's the latest that you think it might come out? JQ. ---

[OT] Testing, please ignore

2005-02-11 Thread J Q
Sorry. Just testing if I am subscribed. Ignore! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[OT]

2005-02-10 Thread J Q
Testing. Please ignore, JQ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]