read that does some calculation that
> you
> >> might need [in my case you have an abstract
> >> > graph and a background thread is checking if the graph has
> intersecting
> >> edges so that algorithms that need to know can
> >> > use a cached answer rat
I assumed they were using the postal abbreviation for the state of Georgia
in the US.
(*Chris*)
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Antonio Petrelli <
antonio.petre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/11/21 Martin Gainty :
> >
> > Buona-sera Antonio
> >
> > ga is nice but i've heard italy has more sunny d
2009/11/21 Martin Gainty :
>
> Buona-sera Antonio
>
> ga is nice but i've heard italy has more sunny days
>
> is this true?
Yes. By the way, what is ga?
Antonio
P.S.: Still not mad ;-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...
alculate it at the time they need it].
>> You can't use a thread local because you want the
>> > background thread to play with the very same variable but still not get
>> in the way of the main thread of the algorithm.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> &g
; Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:53:33 -0800
> Subject: Re: (clearly O/T) use of ThreadLocal vs Synchronized
> From: thechrispr...@gmail.com
> To: user@struts.apache.org
>
> Unfortunately the same cannot be said for OGNL. I spent most of Friday
> going through the interwebs archives an
'information seulement et n'aura
> pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email
> peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter
> aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.
>
>
>
>
> > To: u
importe
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: Re: (clearly O/T) use of ThreadLocal vs Synchronized
> Date:
hread of the algorithm.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Martin Gainty
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Sent: Sat, Nov 21, 2009 8:38 am
Subject: (clearly O/T) use of ThreadLocal vs Synchronized
Good Morning All-
are there any instances where a factory use of synchronized keywo
Buona-sera Antonio
ga is nice but i've heard italy has more sunny days
is this true?
Martin
__
Prego non alteri/modifichi o interrompa questa trasmissione..grazie
> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:07:43 +0100
> Subject: Re: (clearly
2009/11/21 Martin Gainty :
>
> yes in all probability still at
>
>
> pingback when you posted pics of "sunny and dry ga" when you get a chance
Really? I like sun and dry ga. Do you like them?
Antonio
P.S.: I'm not mad, just curious...
---
le" for liberal arts or business majors
> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:22:07 -0500
> From: d...@newfield.org
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: Re: (clearly O/T) use of ThreadLocal vs Synchronized
>
> I think that Martin is a turing test...and I'm beginning to feel t
I think that Martin is a turing test...and I'm beginning to feel that he
might indeed be human...which can only mean the AIs are winning. Can
Skynet be far behind?
ObXKCD: http://xkcd.com/329/
-Dale
P.S.: Even more clearly O/T.
--
Good Morning All-
are there any instances where a factory use of synchronized keyword is
preferred or considered more efficient implementation over creating a
ThreadLocal object?
http://www.javamex.com/tutorials/synchronization_concurrency_thread_local2.shtml
any answers are appreciated!
Marti
13 matches
Mail list logo
