Re: [OT] Re: Struts Approach

2005-02-27 Thread Andrew Hill
> Not to hit below the belt, but the only place that I have seen that > naming used in practice is in the Win32/COM world. Can you name > another? ;-) We do it as part of our coding conventions (we also do the Abstractxxx thing too). Im rather pro doing it that way too. Mostly its a matter of t

Re: [OT] Re: Struts Approach

2005-02-26 Thread Larry Meadors
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:30:18 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you tell me the exact difference between a leading "I" and a leading > "Abstract" ? > > AbstractButton, AbstractModel, AbstractAction... > "Abstract" describes the behavior (the class is an abstract or partial implementation),

[OT] Re: Struts Approach

2005-02-26 Thread Leon Rosenberg
Can you tell me the exact difference between a leading "I" and a leading "Abstract" ? AbstractButton, AbstractModel, AbstractAction... > I am unaware of any interfaces in the JDK that are ISomething. There was almost none of those in jdks 1.0, 1.1.x and so on, till swing / 1.2. Wait till 1.6

[OT] Re: Struts Approach

2005-02-26 Thread Leon Rosenberg
Can you tell me the exact difference between a leading "I" and a leading "Abstract" ? AbstractButton, AbstractModel, AbstractAction... > I am unaware of any interfaces in the JDK that are ISomething. There was almost none of those in jdks 1.0, 1.1.x and so on, till swing / 1.2. Wait till 1.6