Not sure why, but I have never had the difficulty of maintenance being
held up because of appropriate uses of interfaces. I have had the
opposite happen lots of times. I am a stickler for the interface
approach to most classes. I am even thinking of foregoing entirely the
use of the System c
Adam Hardy wrote the following on 10/9/2004 7:34 AM:
However I have never come across a situation where anybody has changed
the implementation when doing an upgrade to their application. It sounds
good, but IMHO, never happens. Would be interested to find out otherwise :)
All of my classes implem
cents.. go for the interface... it will make your life
Easier for the future when you want to change implementation
Regards
marco
-Original Message-
From: atta-ur rehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 October 2004 15:13
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: [OT] Request
nsaje original-
De: Marco Mistroni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: viernes, 08 de octubre de 2004 16:21
Para: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; 'atta-ur rehman'
Asunto: RE: [OT] Request for comments on DAO pattern implementation
Hello,
My 2 cents.. go for the inter
Subject: [OT] Request for comments on DAO pattern implementation
Dear all,
I've contemplated two ways of implementing DAO pattern; and I'm unable
to decide which is better :) Any comments on pros and cons of these
two approaches will be greatly appericiated.
Implementation 1: Have IDAO
Dear all,
I've contemplated two ways of implementing DAO pattern; and I'm unable
to decide which is better :) Any comments on pros and cons of these
two approaches will be greatly appericiated.
Implementation 1: Have IDAO interface and let all the DAO objects
implement this interface; with probab
6 matches
Mail list logo
