gt; > Finally, naming conventions are not enforced by compilers. Name your
> > packages as you wish.
> >
> > -Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 06/17/2005 08:48 AM
> > Please respond to
> > "Struts Users Ma
search castor on goggle
Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Michael Jouravlev wrote:
>I'd love to see a package name built from GUID.
>
>
What, you don't want to name your packages
013f891c58a842f1ba17a3954dded562.utils.StringUtils?
Pansy!
Dave
---
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
I'd love to see a package name built from GUID.
What, you don't want to name your packages
013f891c58a842f1ba17a3954dded562.utils.StringUtils?
Pansy!
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
On 6/17/05, Emmanouil Batsis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Hardy wrote:
>
> > I'd love to drop the whole top-level domain but why on earth is it
> > there in the first place?
>
>
> Domain names are used as identifiers and are controlled by the or
> authority that owns them; as such they are
Adam Hardy wrote:
I'd love to drop the whole top-level domain but why on earth is it
there in the first place?
Domain names are used as identifiers and are controlled by the or
authority that owns them; as such they are an excellent choice for
namespaces/packages as well.
ecoworks.forum
You know, coming from someone who generally dislikes IDEs of any kind, I
have to admit I played with IDEA for a while and it is far and away the
best IDE I've tried. I'm still sticking with UltraEdit, works for me
extremely well. But, if I have to use an IDE of any kind, IDEA is at the
top of my
On 6/17/05, Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What really got me on my last project was changing from one organisation
> to another, the project packages had to be renamed from uk.co.bbb to
> com.siemans and we actually made it all the more pointless by discussing
> whether it should be com.s
ravitas to one's coding! ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 June 2005 13:59
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [OT] package naming nonsense
1. Well, no one suggested that you need to search some archive.
2. It would be di
Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/17/2005 08:48 AM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
Struts Users Mailing List
cc
Subject
Re: [OT] package naming nonsense
OK, silly me, I started using java with 1.2, rather than 1.0, but it's
friday, so please don't
I favour using org.apache.* or com.sun.*, but never com.microsoft.*. It
gives a certain gravitas to one's coding! ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 June 2005 13:59
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [OT] package naming non
. Name your
packages as you wish.
-Dennis
Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/17/2005 08:48 AM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
Struts Users Mailing List
cc
Subject
Re: [OT] package naming nonsense
OK, silly me, I started using java with 1.2, rather th
IL PROTECTED]>
06/17/2005 07:46 AM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
Struts Users Mailing List
cc
Subject
[OT] package naming nonsense
Since it's Friday and I'm just about to start a new project, I thought
I'd ask everyone what they think abou
07:46 AM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
Struts Users Mailing List
cc
Subject
[OT] package naming nonsense
Since it's Friday and I'm just about to start a new project, I thought
I'd ask everyone what they think about something that's alwa
Since it's Friday and I'm just about to start a new project, I thought
I'd ask everyone what they think about something that's always bugged me.
Package names in Java. Why do we all have com.blah.blah or
org.apache.stuff.xxx instead of just plain blah.blah.blah and
apache.stuff.xxx?
What rea
14 matches
Mail list logo
