ve
> > otherwise :-) is the one feature I miss from the old "C days", and it
> can
> > be
> > a very elegant solution to certain problems --- just like recursion
> (which
> > I
> > try to use sparingly as well).
> >
> > Enough :-) I li
so
damm nice to anyone who's used c!
Daniel.
>
> Just my .2 cents
> Lucas
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Struts User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dakota Jack"
> <[EMAIL PROTE
ing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dakota Jack"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:50 AM
> Subject: Re: AW: talking about paradigms
>
> > I agree with Jack. There are pointers everywhere in Java. Java learns
> > from C++
PROTECTED]>
To
"Struts Users Mailing
List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
AW: talking about paradigms
Hi Eddie,
thanx for your reply, I will put it in my poetry album, and reread eat,
each time I'm asking myself about the sense of the living...
Sad, but my p
L PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: AW: talking about paradigms
> I agree with Jack. There are pointers everywhere in Java. Java learns
> from C++ mistake by "hiding" error prone functionality such as
> pointers.
>
> Joshua Block's
I agree with Jack. There are pointers everywhere in Java. Java learns
from C++ mistake by "hiding" error prone functionality such as
pointers.
Joshua Block's book is not a Java Book for beginner. It is target for
experience developer. Probably you should look into Bruce Eckel's
on-line book for mo
Hello, Leon,
There are pointers in Java. Every object is referenced by a pointer.
Indeed, how else could an object be referenced? I am not sure why you
cited Joshua Bloch's book on this. There is not, as Eddie said,
pointer arithmetic.
Jack
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:46:05 +0100, Rosenberg, Leo
Hi Jack,
I like you kind of "cashing out", but I think your diagram misses some points.
In fact the view-controller itself is a view on the application model, where
the business logic unit (which can be a component in a co-architecture i.e.
session-bean) is the appropriate controller. So a comp
lity of the developer to do what's right.
>
> Peace All,
>
> Eddie
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rosenberg, Leon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 15,
> > No, but what about
> >
> > ?
> > (not sure about the syntax).
> whats the problem?
> MVC usually allows 'read-only access to model' for the view
> Also the question is, what you expose to the view.
> If you are afraid that somebody will misuse the library entries -
don't
> expose them.
> I
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. November 2004 11:04
> An: Struts Users Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: talking about paradigms
>
> I don't think EL breaks the MVC pattern. Although it leaves you free
> to do so if you so wish
11 matches
Mail list logo
