Message -
From: "Yves Sy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 1:16 PM
Subject: RE: ActionForm and Transfer Object
The problem with that approach is you'll end up putting you
eckbox
handling via the reset() method.
Regards,
-Yves-
> -Original Message-
> From: Deepak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:23 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: ActionForm and Transfer Object
>
> I like passing a TO into
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: ActionForm and Transfer Object
> Sure Rick, and "where should me do it" might be a good
> discussion (like the one that we`re all going on right
> now).
>
> A few months ago i had a similar discussion in a
> forum.
Sure Rick, and "where should me do it" might be a good
discussion (like the one that we`re all going on right
now).
A few months ago i had a similar discussion in a
forum.
Is someone is interested to hear more opinions, here
it is
http://saloon.javaranch.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topi
Leandro Melo wrote:
Rick,
i agree with you, i also use BeanUtils to populate my
forms.
But, this doesn't go far way from having your
ActionForms dependent on your TOs (or CustomTOs,
doesn' t matter).
Well I wouldn't say they are 'dependent' on each other except that it
makes it easier if the prop
Sebastian Ho wrote:
I thought of putting the TO in session as well to prevent another DB
call.
This will work but if you are using a decent persistence mechanism
another call to your backend layer will have the results of that query
cached so the performance hit is extremely minimal. And unless t
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Hertz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:22 AM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: ActionForm and Transfer Object
>
>
> > > 1) If you have a page which will update fi
> > 1) If you have a page which will update field A, but have
> > field B as hidden,
> > and while the user on this screen is on the phone, someone
> > else updates
> > field B, when the user saves his record, the other guy's
> > field B will be
> > overwritten.
>
> You have this race condition
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 11:22 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: ActionForm and Transfer Object
>
>
> Hi
>
> People have been telling me that ActionForm should not be
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Hertz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 8:51 AM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: ActionForm and Transfer Object
>
>
> Seems to me that the issue is in how you go about hitt
y just view source on the html and discover how to
directly manipulate the database in ways you may or may not want.
> -Original Message-
> From: Leandro Melo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 10:18 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: A
I have been trying out a new solution to this "age-old" conundrum. I
have a UserContainer implements Map object in the Session object. The
UserContainer object implements the Map as indicated in my
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogInstrumentableForms, except
that the UserContainer d
Rick,
i agree with you, i also use BeanUtils to populate my
forms.
But, this doesn't go far way from having your
ActionForms dependent on your TOs (or CustomTOs,
doesn' t matter).
As Sebastian said, i've heard a lot that TOs should
mirror or shouldn't be coupled to your ActionForms,
but i really d
mPlayer;
}
}
- Original Message -
From: "Sebastian Ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:52 AM
Subject: ActionForm and Transfer Object
> Hi
>
> People have been telling m
I don't really like the first solution.
Second solution sounds promising but there's an extra call. But thats
still better than the first solution or using hidden fields in JSP.
I thought of putting the TO in session as well to prevent another DB
call. But that will make everything very confusing
Hi,
I think the usual convention of not using ActionForm in Business tier is
to separate these tiers.
This helps to reduce business tier dependency on Web tier.
I read a design pattern and modified it to my needs .
Here is what i do.
1. Make a tagging interface like AppForm which is generalize
Sebastian Ho wrote:
Say I retrieve a TO from database and convert it into a actionForm for
display. In this case I have 4 fields for my actionForm but 10 in my TO.
(6 are not needed for display). A user updates the 4 fields and the
action convert those into TO. In this case, the other 6 fields will
Hi
People have been telling me that ActionForm should not be dependent on
your TO. Simple because actionForm is for presentation and TO for your
business requirement. Sounds logical and right way to go.
Now that I started developing using struts, it is actually not that
simple.
Say I retrieve a
18 matches
Mail list logo
