ase share them.
>
> Also, how well does Xdoclet work with dyna forms?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:49 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: ActionForm vs. DynaActionForm
>
&g
Hubert Rabago wrote:
That would only get you an object to hold values, right? You'd still
need to put validation rules somewhere. With an ActionForm, its
validate() method should contain this. Of course, it could delegate
it somewhere, but you'd be maintaining that, instead.
I assume you mea
That would only get you an object to hold values, right? You'd still
need to put validation rules somewhere. With an ActionForm, its
validate() method should contain this. Of course, it could delegate
it somewhere, but you'd be maintaining that, instead.
This also would reduce ActionForm reuse,
First, let me say that I understand how Dyna forms work, but I don't use
them. If I'm way off here or suggesting something that isn't possible,
or already has been done, take it easy on me. :)
I was suggesting that perhaps a parser could read a JSP that contains
, and treat that form as a docum
with dyna forms?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:49 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: ActionForm vs. DynaActionForm
>
> I didn't mean "better than either one". I mea
derlying support, are different, just
>> sounds dangerous.
>>
>> As for compile time type information, well, Strings are Strings
>> whether you use one or the other.
>>
>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-user&m=109767197521860&w=2
>>
>
Can you elaborate?
Do you mean a utility that would parse incoming form values and then
map them to my business objects? :)
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:48:33 -0500, Erik Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't mean "better than either one". I meant "better than building
> your own ActionForm by
mpile time type information, well, Strings are Strings
> whether you use one or the other.
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-user&m=109767197521860&w=2
>
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:03:41 -0500, Benedict, Paul C
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What are
nciples, as well as their underlying support, are different, just
sounds dangerous.
As for compile time type information, well, Strings are Strings
whether you use one or the other.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-user&m=109767197521860&w=2
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:03:41 -0500, Benedict, Pa
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-user&m=109767197521860&w=2
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:03:41 -0500, Benedict, Paul C
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What are the advantages and disadvantages of choosing ActionForm vs.
DynaActionForm?
I ask this because I always found DynaActionForm to be
1:04 AM
To: struts-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: ActionForm vs. DynaActionForm
What are the advantages and disadvantages of choosing ActionForm vs.
DynaActionForm?
I ask this because I always found DynaActionForm to be more valuable ...
until a co-worker picked my brain. He did not like the la
imitations, as I already know their
benefits.
Thanks,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Hubert Rabago [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:33 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: ActionForm vs. DynaActionForm
I really would not give too much weight to the blog yo
support, are different, just
sounds dangerous.
As for compile time type information, well, Strings are Strings
whether you use one or the other.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-user&m=109767197521860&w=2
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:03:41 -0500, Benedict, Paul C
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What are the advantages and disadvantages of choosing ActionForm vs.
DynaActionForm?
I ask this because I always found DynaActionForm to be more valuable ...
until a co-worker picked my brain. He did not like the lack of type
information at compile time. I agreed. Also, I don't know how
14 matches
Mail list logo
