On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:30:49 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * I want to be able to define "alias" elements for commands that are used
> a lot, so I don't have to specify the FQCN on every one of them. For
> example,
> the following element (from the unit tests):
>
Here's an informal description of what that ruleset is about.
Informally, we want to be able to parse things like:
...
...
...
...
With a few extra wrinkles:
* I want to be able to substitute the names of
Joe,
Thanks a lot. I will plan on implementing the chain
after a bit more due dilligence. btw, I agree on
making a seperate jar for the set of commands which
provide legacy support. Thanks.
-Julian
--- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 6:28 AM -0800 12/10/04, Julian wrote:
> >Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Also in jakarta news
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/news-2004-2ndHalf.html
>
> and its listed in the "Releases" section on the Commons Chain site:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/chain/
>
===
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/58801
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pilgrim, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Where does it say Common Chain is now released at V1.0
> >
TED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: Common Chain 1.0 and Struts Chain
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/58801
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pilgrim, P
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/58801
- Original Message -
From: "Pilgrim, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 4:34 PM
Subject: RE: Common Ch
004 14:29
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Common Chain 1.0 and Struts Chain
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if the release of Commons Chain 1.0
> will enable a "Best Available" release of Struts with
> struts-chain? If not, how stable is th
I'm really looking forward to this. Big jump forward, I think.
Jack
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:54:30 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 6:28 AM -0800 12/10/04, Julian wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I was wondering if the release of Commons Chain 1.0
> >will enable a "Best Available" release
Afaik Struts v1.3 will have request processor based on Chain.
Future versions may have Action be chain - like.
.V
Julian wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if the release of Commons Chain 1.0
will enable a "Best Available" release of Struts with
struts-chain? If not, how stable is the COR stuff in
Struts?
At 6:28 AM -0800 12/10/04, Julian wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if the release of Commons Chain 1.0
will enable a "Best Available" release of Struts with
struts-chain? If not, how stable is the COR stuff in
Struts?
The struts-chain was working just fine against pre-1.0 releases of
Struts Chain. If
Hi,
I was wondering if the release of Commons Chain 1.0
will enable a "Best Available" release of Struts with
struts-chain? If not, how stable is the COR stuff in
Struts?
Thanks,
Julian
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on yo
12 matches
Mail list logo
