TBF, it was a really old version of XWork. It was addressed and made more
complicated in the most recent version at the time I looked into it (still
not *fixed*, though ... everyone knows how to validate an email address
until they actually read the RFCs!).
-Brian
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:00
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Brian Thompson wrote:
> I've looked into this before. The email validator resolved down to some
> really old code in XWork with a regex that looked something like this:
>
> [a-z0-...@[a-z0-9].[a-z]^3
Thanks.. I hadn't looked at the source.. It looks like the API
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> IIRC the default email validator isn't as robust as the page- long RFC email
> regex. I'd suggest either a patch, ora custom validator.
>
Thanks. I'll try to submit a patch after I get something more robust working
-
tried to use angrygreg+...@gmail.com <
> angrygreg%2b...@gmail.com > as
> an email , and the
> > Struts EmailValidator doesn't like it (Struts 2.2.1)
> >
> > I'm not that great at reading regexp.. it looks like maybe the regexp
> > should support that email a
IIRC the default email validator isn't as robust as the page- long RFC email
regex. I'd suggest either a patch, ora custom validator.
Dave
On Dec 13, 2010 12:11 PM, "Greg Akins" wrote:
> I just tried to use angrygreg+...@gmail.com as
an email , and the
> Struts Emai
I just tried to use angrygreg+...@gmail.com as an email , and the
Struts EmailValidator doesn't like it (Struts 2.2.1)
I'm not that great at reading regexp.. it looks like maybe the regexp
should support that email address.. but I'm not sure.
Can anyone comment on whether EmailV
6 matches
Mail list logo
