Re: Grouping same type validators

2014-05-11 Thread Mats Nyberg
dir and presto. just my 2c mats > Från: Lukasz Lenart > Ämne: Re: Grouping same type validators > Datum: 5 maj 2014 10:17:09 CEST > Till: Struts Users Mailing List > > > It isn't supported and I don't see simple way to achieve this. > > 2014-05-03 23:33

Re: Grouping same type validators

2014-05-11 Thread Mats Nyberg
-plugin. generate the files into the generated classes dir and presto. just my 2c mats >> Från: Lukasz Lenart >> Ämne: Re: Grouping same type validators >> Datum: 5 maj 2014 10:17:09 CEST >> Till: Struts Users Mailing List >> >> >> It isn't suppo

Re: Grouping same type validators

2014-05-05 Thread Antonio Sánchez
Sorry, this is the right one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4340 El lun 05 may 2014 18:39:59 CEST, Antonio Sánchez escribió: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3993 El lun 05 may 2014 13:34:51 CEST, Lukasz Lenart escribió: Sure thing, but it will be rather postponed till 2.5

Re: Grouping same type validators

2014-05-05 Thread Antonio Sánchez
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3993 El lun 05 may 2014 13:34:51 CEST, Lukasz Lenart escribió: Sure thing, but it will be rather postponed till 2.5 2014-05-05 13:31 GMT+02:00 Antonio Sánchez : Would it worth the while to post an enhancement request? El lun 05 may 2014 10:17:09 CEST,

Re: Grouping same type validators

2014-05-05 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Sure thing, but it will be rather postponed till 2.5 2014-05-05 13:31 GMT+02:00 Antonio Sánchez : > Would it worth the while to post an enhancement request? > > El lun 05 may 2014 10:17:09 CEST, Lukasz Lenart escribió: >> >> It isn't supported and I don't see simple way to achieve this. >> >> 2014

Re: Grouping same type validators

2014-05-05 Thread Antonio Sánchez
Would it worth the while to post an enhancement request? El lun 05 may 2014 10:17:09 CEST, Lukasz Lenart escribió: It isn't supported and I don't see simple way to achieve this. 2014-05-03 23:33 GMT+02:00 Antonio Sánchez : Hello. in a middle sized application there may be hundreds of required

Re: Grouping same type validators

2014-05-05 Thread Lukasz Lenart
It isn't supported and I don't see simple way to achieve this. 2014-05-03 23:33 GMT+02:00 Antonio Sánchez : > Hello. > > in a middle sized application there may be hundreds of required fields, and > maybe dozens of some other validator type, which are all very verbose to > define. > > For instance

Re: Grouping same type validators

2014-05-05 Thread Antonio Sánchez
I don't think so. That code validates a filed named person.lastNameAndFirstName for a sequence of blank separated words. I'm asking for for an abbreviated syntax for defining required validations, or once for all defining validations that will be present all along the project. MG> person.

RE: Grouping same type validators

2014-05-03 Thread Martin Gainty
> Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 23:33:09 +0200 > From: ads...@gmail.com > To: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: Grouping same type validators > > Hello. > > in a middle sized application there may be hundreds of required fields, > and maybe dozens of some other validat

Grouping same type validators

2014-05-03 Thread Antonio Sánchez
Hello. in a middle sized application there may be hundreds of required fields, and maybe dozens of some other validator type, which are all very verbose to define. For instance: guess a big form with many required fields: person.firstName First name is required.