matically, it's still over my head for some reason (I
could just be in the wrong place whenever I go look at it).
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 1:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subj
I wasn't working with Struts upload. I'm not sure what the point of all
the code you posted was, right now I don't have time to go through it to
figure out what's going on.
In the end I simply passed an ArrayList back to the view as a request
attribute, problem solved. I would have preferred
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:51:43 -0500, David G. Friedman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig,
>
> Is there a tutorial or walk-through explaining Shale? I didn't see that in
> the nightly download. I have no clue about JSF and skimming through the
> Shale code made little sense to me (at this time).
y head for some reason (I
could just be in the wrong place whenever I go look at it).
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 1:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Here's a quest
Actually the RequestProcessor logic is irrelevant, although seemingly
not so. You just need to alter RequestUtils.
My experience is that there are lots, and lots, of people doing
uploads in Struts outside the "norm".
I for one find tht the "ad nauseum" comments you refer to are as good
as gold a
I do this all the time without using the ActionForm at all,
unfortunately. I don't know if the solutions I use would be helpful,
but here is one: I call an action setting up a page for uploads. Then
I upload, setting up a listener/monitor in the the Upload object which
is buried in the commons mu
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:52:07 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I sometimes wonder if we (the generic we I mean) don't sometimes think
> at too high a level... We try to build so much flexibility into our
> designs, but every time I hear "a new API" or "a new interface" or
> "an
Craig McClanahan wrote:
In Struts 1.0 - 1.2, there's no way to do this other than by
overriding RequestProcessor and dinking with the processPopulate()
method. With the way 1.3 is evolving, it would be feasible to make
the Command that normally does population do something different
instead.
That
Dunno about struts 1.2, but in 1.1 there wasn't an option for it. That
said, it would probably take you only a few minutes to override the
request processor to do it.
indeed I recall having done that before myself a year or two back
ahh... here we go -
protected void processPopulate(HttpServletR
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:40:39 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is of course possible to turn of form validation on a per-mapping
> basis... Is it possible to turn off auto-population?
In Struts 1.0 - 1.2, there's no way to do this other than by
overriding RequestProcessor an
It is of course possible to turn of form validation on a per-mapping
basis... Is it possible to turn off auto-population?
It's never come up for me before a few minutes ago... I'm doing a file
upload project, and when I upload the files I'd like an ActionForm to be
created but NOT populated wit
11 matches
Mail list logo
