Re: Interceptor order

n my mind how the alternative version is better (other than your assertion that it will work :o}). Later, Andy -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Interceptor-order-tp28597967p28623423.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: Interceptor order

*is* available in the JSPs. > > > It is as if setting a value on the ValueStack like that somehow wipes out > the Request parameters from the context. > > Obviously I have two possible workarounds but this is bugging me. I don't > want to make my Actions know about the object

Re: Interceptor order

t somehow wipes out the Request parameters from the context. Obviously I have two possible workarounds but this is bugging me. I don't want to make my Actions know about the object being injected - this is not part of their logic. Also, I don't want to have an application with some "

Re: Interceptor order

ion is using is actually the stack that you think it is. (BTDTGTTS) Secondly, I've never tried to poke the ValueStack directly, I've always used Interceptors to load objects into my actions and then retrieved them from there with the standard struts tags. What happens if you take all

Interceptor order

in context: http://old.nabble.com/Interceptor-order-tp28597967p28597967.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Control Interceptor order

Others should definitely correct me if I'm wrong, but interceptors don't inject other interceptors, just actions. If you need access to the Session, just use the one in the ActionInvocation. (*Chris*) On 7/8/07, Richard Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I added an Interceptor locally to one of

Control Interceptor order

I added an Interceptor locally to one of my Actions. This Interceptor implements SessionAware and has a setSession(Map session) method to get the session. The problem is when my interceptor runs session is null. I am assuming this is because the interceptor that populates the session aware obje