elf.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/MethodFilterInterceptor-%3Cpackage%3E-tp24465361p24491255.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@s
The logic considers the action name without regard to the package the action
is contained within.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > independent of the methods' package name
>
> I am not sure what you mean by this. example?
>
> musachy
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me
> independent of the methods' package name
I am not sure what you mean by this. example?
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For ad
Either I have been asleep at the wheel or have simply lucked into a naming
scheme. It appears the MethodFilterInterceptor is performing its
include/exclude logic independent of the methods' package name. Has anyone
been snapped by this?
Peace,
Scott
--
View this message in context:
4 matches
Mail list logo
