The logic considers the action name without regard to the package the action
is contained within.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
independent of the methods' package name
I am not sure what you mean by this. example?
musachy
--
Hey you! Would you
stanlick wrote:
The logic considers the action name without regard to the package the
action
is contained within.
I'm confused by this also. I thought an example implied either a real-world
or contrived scenario where the problem in question manifests itself.
--
View this message in
Either I have been asleep at the wheel or have simply lucked into a naming
scheme. It appears the MethodFilterInterceptor is performing its
include/exclude logic independent of the methods' package name. Has anyone
been snapped by this?
Peace,
Scott
--
View this message in context:
independent of the methods' package name
I am not sure what you mean by this. example?
musachy
--
Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone? Pink Floyd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For
4 matches
Mail list logo