To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
On Friday 10 December 2004 16:38, David G. Friedman wrote:
> Derek,
>
> If you made a list of bullet points for the parts of struts layout you
like
> most, perhaps we listmembers could point you in the direction of na
On Friday 10 December 2004 16:38, David G. Friedman wrote:
> Derek,
>
> If you made a list of bullet points for the parts of struts layout you like
> most, perhaps we listmembers could point you in the direction of native
> Struts parts or equivalent add-ons.
I don't really see how there could be
t; > From: Hubert Rabago [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:55 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
> >
> > It already does. It's the third option on
> > http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
&
--Original Message-
> From: Hubert Rabago [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:55 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
>
> It already does. It's the third option on
> http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Brantley Hobbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:49 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List; Dakota Jack
> Subject: RE: Opinions on Struts Layout
>
>
> Thanks for the tip about the spelling. I did some googling, but
did
December 10, 2004 3:49 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; Dakota Jack
Subject: RE: Opinions on Struts Layout
Thanks for the tip about the spelling. I did some googling, but didn't
really see too much information about struts-layout as compared to some
of the other technologies, which is rea
t;
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> B.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David G. Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:52 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: Opinions on Struts Layo
Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
>
> Look under struts-layout. The results of googling for struts-layout
> are somewhat surprising and you might want to do that too. Naming is
> so important. Why Struts Layout went with struts-layout is a mystery
>
Look under struts-layout. The results of googling for struts-layout
are somewhat surprising and you might want to do that too. Naming is
so important. Why Struts Layout went with struts-layout is a mystery
to me. Wrong side of the brain problem, I guess.
Jack
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:41:50 -08
If you look at the Struts dev an user lists, Brantley, you will find
quite a bit on this too.
Jack
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:03:59 -0500, Brantley Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> When our organization was making the decision between .NET and J2EE, we
> were really struck by how powe
, December 10, 2004 3:07 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
On Friday 10 December 2004 14:03, Brantley Hobbs wrote:
>
> Well, I ran across Struts Layout
> (http://struts.application-servers.com/index.html). Perhaps I've been
> living under a
On Friday 10 December 2004 14:03, Brantley Hobbs wrote:
>
> Well, I ran across Struts Layout
> (http://struts.application-servers.com/index.html). Perhaps I've been
> living under a rock for a while, but it was something that I'd never
> heard of before, and it seems to offer exactly what we longe
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vic
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 12:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
>
>
> Brantley Hobbs wrote:
>
> >Hi all!
> >
> >When our
Brantley Hobbs wrote:
Hi all!
When our organization was making the decision between .NET and J2EE, we
were really struck by how powerful MS's idea of web forms were. The
ability to drag/drop web controls onto a page is very attractive, simply
because our developers were hired to develop; not gener
Hi all!
When our organization was making the decision between .NET and J2EE, we
were really struck by how powerful MS's idea of web forms were. The
ability to drag/drop web controls onto a page is very attractive, simply
because our developers were hired to develop; not generate HTML (as I'm
sure
15 matches
Mail list logo
