On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:52 AM, alex zaim wrote:
> When you said getText() i thought you meant value="getText('some.key')" />
>
> It works all good now when i use it from validate().
>
> Thanks a lot!
No problem!
Dave
-
To uns
When you said getText() i thought you meant
It works all good now when i use it from validate().
Thanks a lot!
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:01 AM, alex zaim wrote:
>>No. Use existing getText(...) methods.
>
> That will be parsed right before validation. I want to show the fielderror
> results...
> in another language.
I don't understand what you're saying.
If you're doing validation in validate(). getText(
>No. Use existing getText(...) methods.
That will be parsed right before validation. I want to show the fielderror
results... in another language.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:38 AM, alex zaim wrote:
> Please suggest the best method, if possible. (perhaps from right within
> validate() method?
> should i make my own resource parser in this case?)
No. Use existing getText(...) methods.
Dave
---
Please suggest the best method, if possible. (perhaps from right within
validate() method? should i make my own resource parser in this case?)
ve CPU, use Tiles Controllers! LOL.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Siggelkow
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Post Validation
>
> Well, the type of act
st when you use that design philosophy.
Regards,
David
---
Save CPU, use Tiles Controllers! LOL.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Siggelkow
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Post Validation
Well, the type of
warding to a tile with a
tiles controller work better (i.e. less processing power) in that situation?
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Siggelkow
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Post Validation
power) in that situation?
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Siggelkow
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Post Validation
You're on the right path, Lee. Instead of setting the "input&
Lee Harrington writes:
> I'm using DynaValidator forms. Works great, except when you have pick
[...]
Please don't hit "answer" on a random message in your email
program when you want to start a new thread. Your email program
keeps track of what message it thinks you were answering (the
Referen
You're on the right path, Lee. Instead of setting the "input" to the
JSP, set it to an action, which creates your pick lists and stuffs them
in the request, that precedes the JSP.
-Bill Siggelkow
Lee Harrington wrote:
I'm using DynaValidator forms. Works great, except when you have pick
lists a
I'm using DynaValidator forms. Works great, except when you have pick
lists and a validation fails. When the validation fails, it calls the
form, but the code that puts the pick lists in the request scope isn't
rerun.
No biggieI put my lists in the session scope.
However, I don't want them
13 matches
Mail list logo
