Dear Dave,
newton.dave wrote:
>
> Please stop referring to the action as a "redirecting action". Results may
> redirect; actions specify results.
>
>
Yes, sorry, results recirect.
newton.dave wrote:
>
> In addition to trying the things I and others have mentioned, PLEASE do
> the followin
Please stop referring to the action as a "redirecting action". Results may
redirect; actions specify results.
In addition to trying the things I and others have mentioned, PLEASE do the
following:
1) Look at the code for the redirectAction and step through it--this is a
trivial step and would
Hi Nils-Helge,
yes, I only use session attribute in my action class which implements
SessionAware interface.
--
Regards, Milan
Nils-Helge Garli wrote:
>
> And you're sure it's a session attribute and not a request attribute?
>
> Nils-H
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Milan Milanovic
>
Dear Dave,
Standard action is no redirect action.
My session variables was deleted somewhere between my action class method
and its resulting jsp, because in my action class method I had that
variable, and in jsp I don't have it any more.
O.K. I can put monitoring interceptor or listener like J
Maybe adding a session listener to your web.xml is a little bit easier.
E.g. a listener like below
import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionAttributeListener;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionBindingEvent;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionEvent;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionListener;
Some request parameters are prohibited, too, but those aren't session
attributes.
Dave
--- On Wed, 8/6/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [S2] Refactoring Action classes
> To: user@struts.ap
--- On Wed, 8/6/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know really, I don't use HTTPS, my cookies are enabled, my
> redirect action deleted my session variables, when I changed this
> action to standard action it worked, NO other part of the code is
> changed.
What do you mean,
And you're sure it's a session attribute and not a request attribute?
Nils-H
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Milan Milanovic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Dave,
>
> I don't know really, I don't use HTTPS, my cookies are enabled, my redirect
> action deleted my session variables, when I chan
Dear Dave,
I don't know really, I don't use HTTPS, my cookies are enabled, my redirect
action deleted my session variables, when I changed this action to standard
action it worked, NO other part of the code is changed.
--
Milan
newton.dave wrote:
>
> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
--- On Wed, 8/6/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> newton.dave wrote:
>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
>>> No, my cookies are enabled all the time. But if my
>>> JSessionID is not automatically appended to the new
>>> location by container/struts2 in case of redirect action, why ?
>>
>> Pr
I don't understand, but enabled cookies is defualt behavior, isn't it ?
--
Regards, Milan
newton.dave wrote:
>
> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, my cookies are enabled all the time. But if my JSessionID is not
>> automatically appended to the new location
--- On Wed, 8/6/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, my cookies are enabled all the time. But if my JSessionID is not
> automatically appended to the new location by container/struts2 in
> case of redirect action, why ?
Probably because cookies are enabled all the time.
Dave
--
Dear Jeromy,
Jeromy Evans - Blue Sky Minds wrote:
>
> Out of interest, which container and browser are you testing with and
> how is the browser sending the JSessionID to your container?
> Within the browser you can determine whether you are using the same
> JSessionID or a new one by monitor
Milan Milanovic wrote:
Dear Al and Dave,
I tried to fix that error with session variable all weekend and I didn't
managed to fix it. When action is defined as redirect action to another
namespace, and when that action is called, another action called method
doesn't see my session variables. I ju
You can change the action name to something more explicit so instead of
just load, save, load, save, you could have firstObjectLoad,
firstObjectSave,
You may want to look up RESTful URLs to get some inspiration.
Al.
Milan Milanovic wrote:
Thanks Al.
But in this way, how I'll now which l
Thanks Al.
But in this way, how I'll now which load is for which class when defining a
link ?
--
Regards, Milan
Al Sutton wrote:
>
> More like;
>
> extends="struts-default">
>class="FirstObjectManager">...
>class="FirstObjectManager">...
>class="SecondObjectManager">
More like;
...
...
...
...
...
You can also use singletons, utility classes, and good old-fashioned
inheritance to reduce code duplication (remember, Actions don't have to
extend ActionSupport, ActionSupport is just a utility class).
Al.
Milan Milan
Dear Al,
O.K. You suggest that I have multiple classes in one package/namespace, like
this:
...
...
...
?
I understand what are you talking about, but my class is connected to little
bit
gt; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:47:24 +0100> From: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]> To: user@struts.apache.org> Subject: Re: [S2] Refactoring Action
classes> > You don't need to have all your actions for a namespace in a single
> class, you can use multiple classes.> > I usually group
You don't need to have all your actions for a namespace in a single
class, you can use multiple classes.
I usually group methods acting on a common object into a single class
which usually leaves me with the 5 public methods in a class which map
to actions (typically CRUD plus a View method),
20 matches
Mail list logo
