Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-29 Thread Kevin Clifton
> > James Mitchell > > > Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist > > > EdgeTech, Inc. > > > 678.910.8017 > > > AIM: jmitchtx > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
e - > > From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:14 AM > > Subject: [OT] Re: Hiding .do > > > > >I forgot this about Struts 1.2.

Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
ginal Message - > From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:14 AM > Subject: [OT] Re: Hiding .do > > >I forgot this about Struts 1.2.4, James. Good p

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
e - > From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:48 AM > Subject: Re: Hiding .do > > > James' condition, viz. "if you've coded your app with

RE: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Chappell, Simon P
sers Mailing List; Dakota Jack >Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do > > >What about *.spankMe ? (Think I might have lost that client) > > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist >EdgeTech, Inc. >678.910.8017 >AIM: jmitchtx > >-

Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread James Mitchell
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:14 AM Subject: [OT] Re: Hiding .do I forgot this about Struts 1.2.4, James. Good point. I think your thing with the marketing people is funny. While I am certain it was not so funny for you at that time, I would have liked to be a p

[OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
angelist > EdgeTech, Inc. > 678.910.8017 > AIM: jmitchtx > > - Original Message - > From: "Chaikin, Yaakov Y." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:32

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread James Mitchell
sage - From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:48 AM Subject: Re: Hiding .do James' condition, viz. "if you've coded your app without hard references to '.d

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
James' condition, viz. "if you've coded your app without hard references to '.do'", is really important here. But, you can change your extension to anything you want, as he says. You are mistaken that the tags add ".do". They don't. The answer to your question has been extensively discussed in

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread James Mitchell
technology behind it.GEZ!! -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "Chaikin, Yaakov Y." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL P

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Tuncay Baskan
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:32:30 -0400, Chaikin, Yaakov Y. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James, > > Is that really true? > > Are you saying that Struts custom tags automatically pick up their extension > from the controller servlet mapping in web.xml? > > Hmm... I was under the impression that it was

RE: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Chaikin, Yaakov Y.
ing List Subject: Re: Hiding .do If you've coded your app without hard references to ".do", then you only need to change the web.xml file and all links/forms will be changed. For some fun, try changing to *.aspx and give a demo to your boss!! -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / O

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread James Mitchell
If you've coded your app without hard references to ".do", then you only need to change the web.xml file and all links/forms will be changed. For some fun, try changing to *.aspx and give a demo to your boss!! -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.80