To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
On Friday 10 December 2004 16:38, David G. Friedman wrote:
> Derek,
>
> If you made a list of bullet points for the parts of struts layout you
like
> most, perhaps we listmembers could point you in the direction of na
On Friday 10 December 2004 16:38, David G. Friedman wrote:
> Derek,
>
> If you made a list of bullet points for the parts of struts layout you like
> most, perhaps we listmembers could point you in the direction of native
> Struts parts or equivalent add-ons.
I don't really see how there could be
t; > From: Hubert Rabago [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:55 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
> >
> > It already does. It's the third option on
> > http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
&
--Original Message-
> From: Hubert Rabago [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:55 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
>
> It already does. It's the third option on
> http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Brantley Hobbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:49 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List; Dakota Jack
> Subject: RE: Opinions on Struts Layout
>
>
> Thanks for the tip about the spelling. I did some googling, but
did
December 10, 2004 3:49 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; Dakota Jack
Subject: RE: Opinions on Struts Layout
Thanks for the tip about the spelling. I did some googling, but didn't
really see too much information about struts-layout as compared to some
of the other technologies, which is rea
t;
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> B.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David G. Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:52 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: Opinions on Struts Layo
Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
>
> Look under struts-layout. The results of googling for struts-layout
> are somewhat surprising and you might want to do that too. Naming is
> so important. Why Struts Layout went with struts-layout is a mystery
>
Look under struts-layout. The results of googling for struts-layout
are somewhat surprising and you might want to do that too. Naming is
so important. Why Struts Layout went with struts-layout is a mystery
to me. Wrong side of the brain problem, I guess.
Jack
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:41:50 -08
If you look at the Struts dev an user lists, Brantley, you will find
quite a bit on this too.
Jack
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:03:59 -0500, Brantley Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> When our organization was making the decision between .NET and J2EE, we
> were really struck by how powe
, December 10, 2004 3:07 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
On Friday 10 December 2004 14:03, Brantley Hobbs wrote:
>
> Well, I ran across Struts Layout
> (http://struts.application-servers.com/index.html). Perhaps I've been
> living under a
On Friday 10 December 2004 14:03, Brantley Hobbs wrote:
>
> Well, I ran across Struts Layout
> (http://struts.application-servers.com/index.html). Perhaps I've been
> living under a rock for a while, but it was something that I'd never
> heard of before, and it seems to offer exactly what we longe
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vic
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 12:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
>
>
> Brantley Hobbs wrote:
>
> >Hi all!
> >
> >When our
Brantley Hobbs wrote:
Hi all!
When our organization was making the decision between .NET and J2EE, we
were really struck by how powerful MS's idea of web forms were. The
ability to drag/drop web controls onto a page is very attractive, simply
because our developers were hired to develop; not gener
14 matches
Mail list logo