Re: Struts 2: running processes/threads in background

2016-07-18 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2016-07-18 16:35 GMT+02:00 Martin Gainty : >> "execAndWait" result should be sufficient for your usecase. I was >> wondering if implementing something based on actors would make sense >> but not sure if this will play nicely with Servlets. > MG>could this be a solution to run struts with a Mock Dis

RE: Struts 2: running processes/threads in background

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Gainty
> From: lukaszlen...@apache.org > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:49:28 +0200 > Subject: Re: Struts 2: running processes/threads in background > To: user@struts.apache.org > > Hi, > > "execAndWait" result should be sufficient for your usecase. I was > wonderi

Re: Struts 2: running processes/threads in background

2016-07-17 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Hi, "execAndWait" result should be sufficient for your usecase. I was wondering if implementing something based on actors would make sense but not sure if this will play nicely with Servlets. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2016-07-17 22:13 GMT+02:00 Adam Brin : >

Re: Struts 2: running processes/threads in background

2016-07-17 Thread Adam Brin
Execute and Wait would definitely work. Alternately, if you're using Spring in the background you could use their @Async methodology for simple multi-threading, and just leave Struts for basic AJAX calls to start and check status. On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Peter Hilzbrich wrote: > Hello,