On 8/18/05, Eduardo Ribeiro da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody knows how I can generate JSP with struts tags with XSLT and pass JSP
> to
> JSPProcessor, for compile them? Because I have tags that client browse simple
> don't known.
The strategy you are asking for is essentially:
We have been using stxx for a while now, mostly for output
transformations only and it work perfectly. I would recommend you to
consider it, and I have no stock in stxx ;-) !
Apart from this, we quite often use inline XSL transformations provided
by JSTL nowadays not as flexible, but certainly
det: Donnerstag, 18. August 2005 22:11
> An: Struts Users Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: Struts with XSLT
> Ever heard of translets? But even if you call XSLT processor
> for every request, I D-O-N'T C-A-R-E. This is not a software
> problem, this is a hardware problem. And even expe
7:08 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Cc:
Subject: Re: Struts with XSLT
I have also successfully used Struts and XSLT, Haven't had an issue.
I currently use JSP to generate the dynamic top component, and then
i
On 8/18/05, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/18/05, Graham Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * Should I just stop fighting city hall and abandon XSLT in
> > favour of JSP?
>
> Yes :-) Really. We did it a year ago, and gained A LOT of performance. Not
> to mention that XSLT
>
On Thursday 18 August 2005 20:52, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
> > I'm glad to see there is some support for XSLT. Makes me feel
> > like I haven't been barking up the wrong tree for the last
> > few years. Sending the XML to the client is a nice idea in
> > principal but has so many problems that IMHO it
> I'm glad to see there is some support for XSLT. Makes me feel
> like I haven't been barking up the wrong tree for the last
> few years. Sending the XML to the client is a nice idea in
> principal but has so many problems that IMHO it's not worth
> it. Transformation server side is cheap
On Thursday 18 August 2005 20:32, Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> On 8/18/05, Graham Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Should I just stop fighting city hall and abandon XSLT in favour of
> > JSP?
>
> No. XML/XSLT is more flexible than JSP and has been supported bunch of
> other markup tecnhologies
On 8/18/05, Graham Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Should I just stop fighting city hall and abandon XSLT in favour of JSP?
No. XML/XSLT is more flexible than JSP and has been supported bunch of
other markup tecnhologies like XML, XHTML and XPath for a long time.
Keep it if it works. Don't fo
I have also successfully used Struts and XSLT, Haven't had an issue.
I currently use JSP to generate the dynamic top component, and then
include the XSLT generated HTML in the main content area.
I think that it is easier to manipulate XML with XSLT then it is to
do it with JSP/Tags.
-Jo
I used XSLT for all my applications to generate content as html files which
Struts includes in a page template using tiles.
It also allows me to search the pages as pure html content.
If you are putting logic in your page you could... don't shudder, use XSLT
to generate JSP's.
-Original Mess
On 8/18/05, Graham Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Should I just stop fighting city hall and abandon XSLT in favour of JSP?
Two thoughts strike me as I read your discussion, and the reasoning
for which you like XSLT:
* You seem to be concluding that XSLT and JSP are mutually exclusive.
Esp
On Thursday 18 August 2005 16:02, Don Brown wrote:
> Hmm...smell of death for stxx might be a bit harsh :)
Yeah ok, it was a bit harsh - sorry. I'll take another look. It's sometimes
hard to know when a project is on it's last legs though. A message from one
of the core developers within an ho
Hmm...smell of death for stxx might be a bit harsh :) While it true I
need to get a release out that better supports 1.2, I've been using it
in production for over a year without problems, and would recommend
you take another look. You, of course, are welcome to get involved,
submit patches, even
14 matches
Mail list logo
