Re: [ANN] WebWork 2.2.1: Released and Ready for Struts!

2006-02-07 Thread Ted Husted
On 2/7/06, Pilgrim, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You due to teach a course in the UK, but I see it was canceled > with James Holmes has taking over the spot. > Are you coming over to the UK in the future anyway? > I know you wanted to come to JAVAWUG meet up. Yes, sadly, I developed a confli

Re: [ANN] WebWork 2.2.1: Released and Ready for Struts!

2006-02-07 Thread Ted Husted
On 2/7/06, Raghu Kanchustambham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can start off yet another holy war on merits of "special frameworks" > for special purposes vs. a utopian one framework for all purposes! But > instead let me just ask a few simple question: > What does this integration mean to a develo

RE: [ANN] WebWork 2.2.1: Released and Ready for Struts!

2006-02-07 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
Ted Congratulations You due to teach a course in the UK, but I see it was canceled with James Holmes has taking over the spot. Are you coming over to the UK in the future anyway? I know you wanted to come to JAVAWUG meet up. > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [ANN] WebWork 2.2.1: Released and Ready for Struts!

2006-02-07 Thread Raghu Kanchustambham
Hi Ted, While ideally an announcement like this should bring across "joy", ironically enough it brings some "concerns" to developers like me! I am uninitiated in WebWork yet. I have just learnt a bit of struts some 4 months ago. Just when I thought I learnt a little the "floor (read framework)" mo