;To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>Subject: RE: [OT] thick client functionality in the browser
>
>
>I hope you weren't referring to me Simon? I'm still too
>young... and most of
>my money pours into recreational vehicles and booze ;-)
>
>-Origi
ubject: RE: [OT] thick client functionality in the browser
>-Original Message-
>From: Hookom, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>in Netscape 7 and Mozilla anyway. If I'm wrong, if you can show me an
>example that works in IE, I would name my next child after you :)
&q
>-Original Message-
>From: Hookom, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>in Netscape 7 and Mozilla anyway. If I'm wrong, if you can show me an
>example that works in IE, I would name my next child after you :)
"next"? You already have some? ;-)
Simon
-
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 9:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] thick client functionality in the browser
I believe the scrolling table body functionality is only currently supported
in Netscape 7 and Mozilla anyway. If I'm wrong, if you can show me an
ex
have the headers on each
page, but I don't think it matters to on-screen rendering. Am I wrong?
Frank
From: Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROT
Frank Zammetti wrote:
You know what I discovered about a month ago? Instead of using iFrames,
you can get the same functionality with a with
style="overflow:scroll;".
The problem with this, though, is when you when you want your table to
be able to change in width. If you have a fixed width i
;m all for it, but I'm not sure how
> appropriate it is to the Struts list. If people are interested though, and
> no one objects, it might make a nice thread, something like "Rich GUI
> tricks" or something.
>
> Frank
>
> >Daniel.
> >
> > > -Original
AN do it in script and the
> result is a
> snappier interface that is less error prone (because of reduced network
> activity and server load), but it's not good architecturally.
> It's not that
> dHTML and scripting MAKES you make bad choices, just that it
> makes it easier
&g
ssary
in the response - eg when searching data, only replace the inside of the
iframe.
Daniel.
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 June 2004 17:08
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OT] thick client functionality in the brow
ply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] thick client functionality in the browser
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:04:36 -0400
I agree with Frank that -- it is amazing what you can do with JavaScript
and IE-specific stuff. A few jobs ago
:)
Daniel.
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 June 2004 16:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OT] thick client functionality in the browser
>
>
> I've personally made something of a career out of doing what y
I agree with Frank that -- it is amazing what you can do with JavaScript
and IE-specific stuff. A few jobs ago I had to inherit an heavy
JavaScript app where the page was generated with XSLT. I converted to
use Struts but I had to preserve the JavaScript. It is difficult to
keep the MVC arch
el.
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 June 2004 16:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OT] thick client functionality in the browser
>
>
> I've personally made something of a career out of doing what your ta
Yes, quick, where did I misplace my medication..? ;)
>
> Now that I've opened a theological nightmare here... ;)
>
> Frank
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've personally made something of a career out of doing what your talking
about. The applications I've built at work are known to have very
Windows-like look, feel and functionality, much more so than most other
web-based applications.
To pull it off, two things are true... first, it is IE onl
15 matches
Mail list logo
