Thanks, David. Great doable ideas!
I have a couple questions...
Where is the best place to put server side validation?
I think that's a substep of either "Author Business
Services" or "Author Actions".
Same question about client-side validation.
Do you think Bugzilla is more of a QA- or a Te
rs Mailing List
Subject: Re: Application Development Procedure Doc (Again)
Dan,
I don't really understand the document you posted. Maybe it would
be better served
in wiki format or you could post in pdf or something like that. As it
is, I was pretty confused
when I first saw it.
Dan Canc
Dan,
I don't really understand the document you posted. Maybe it would
be better served
in wiki format or you could post in pdf or something like that. As it
is, I was pretty confused
when I first saw it.
Dan Cancro wrote:
Hi Group,
This is plea #2 for help with a soup-to-nuts How-To
doc I'm
All set! It works in Mozilla now.
Here's the link again:
http://www.geocities.com/topdowndan/docs/webapp/
--- Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> No, I think it just wrapped on you. Put your
> anti-Microsoft tiger back
> in its cage and step away from the door ;)
>
> It seemed to work O
Any input or corrections would be great. I haven't
done one of these before, so I'm afraid I don't really
know what I don't know. I just sort of browsed the
web and my memory of past projects for partial
instructions and then dumped them in the doc as best I
could. There are some questions in th
temper temper
Thanks for the constructive criticism. I'll see if
there's an open source evangelistically kosher way to
get it working on another browser.
--- James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> umm...I'm confused. I clicked that link and the
> page doesn't mean squat to
> me. The top
Dan,
just realised how unhelpful that msg was. What are you actually asking
for? Random suggestions or something specific?
Adam
On 11/12/2004 07:26 PM Adam Hardy wrote:
No, I think it just wrapped on you. Put your anti-Microsoft tiger back
in its cage and step away from the door ;)
It seemed to
No, I think it just wrapped on you. Put your anti-Microsoft tiger back
in its cage and step away from the door ;)
It seemed to work OK in Mozilla for me. The blanks are iframes rather
than text areas. Not all of the nodes have them.
Looks like Dan is still writing his expert system on how to se
umm...I'm confused. I clicked that link and the page doesn't mean squat to
me. The top frame is only half rendered (being cut off by the bottom
frame).
The tree items only expand to empty (and rather oversized) text areas.
Am I supposed to view this page with IE? If so, then forget about gett
9 matches
Mail list logo
