Mike Elliott wrote the following on 7/18/2005 3:18 PM:
I came up with another solution which might be worthy of
consideration. Instead of using arrays, extend a list with the
desired get( int ) method and use that list instead:
public class SkillActionForm extends ActionForm {
protecte
I've stumbled across a similar problem that I'm trying to find the
Struts solution for.
I have a form which allows users to add a dynamic amount of rows (via
a button that says "Add Row") and then submit the form with as little
or many rows as they wish. Can a form bean be setup using collections
On 7/18/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still not totally clear where the problem is, since I'm not sure
> what Session has to do with the initial setup of the form.
The difference is unobvious, I admit, but this is what I was thinking
of: If I use a session bean, I can do some
Andrew Tomaka wrote the following on 7/18/2005 2:13 PM:
I have a form which allows users to add a dynamic amount of rows (via
a button that says "Add Row") and then submit the form with as little
or many rows as they wish. Can a form bean be setup using collections
instead of other object types
Michael Jouravlev wrote the following on 7/18/2005 3:59 PM:
ActionForm.reset() for session-scoped forms, ActionForm.ActionForm()
for request-scoped forms. I do not remeber, if reset() is called for
request-scoped forms.
Yes, reset is always called when the form submits. I know I mentioned in
On 7/18/05, Mike Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I use a session bean, I can do some sort of setup (from an
> Action) on its initial creation, including creating the list of
> contained objects. That can't happen if it's in request scope because
> there is no chance to invoke the setup bef
Mike Elliott wrote the following on 7/18/2005 10:55 AM:
I've been beating my head against this all weekend to no avail. I
understand how to do this in session scope, but don't know if it's
even possible in request scope.
As I understand things (which may be wrong), when the form is
submitted (
On 7/18/05, Mike Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well I could see for large forms with nested data it might not be a
> > great idea to keep these around in the Session. I 'try' to stick to
> > using the Request when I can but I don't bend over backwards like
> > some do on this list to a
> Well I could see for large forms with nested data it might not be a
> great idea to keep these around in the Session. I 'try' to stick to
> using the Request when I can but I don't bend over backwards like
> some do on this list to avoid the Session.. I'm in "The Session is your
> friend" ca
On 7/18/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Jouravlev wrote the following on 7/18/2005 3:59 PM:
>
> > ActionForm.reset() for session-scoped forms, ActionForm.ActionForm()
> > for request-scoped forms. I do not remeber, if reset() is called for
> > request-scoped forms.
>
> Yes,
just found 10,000 ways that won't work."-- Thomas
Edison
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Iterate over list in in list in form bean.
There are ways to resolve this, see this page on the wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogLazyList
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 3:55 PM
On 7/13/05, Jörg Eichhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for the
On 7/13/05, Jörg Eichhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for the hint and example. I've choosen the nested way to do this,
> because i
> think this makes the jsp code more readable.
>
> I there a way to do the same using request scope?
> When i do this i get an exception because the collecti
On 7/13/05, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not Friday, but I'd like to now what you need the JSTL tags for? What
> is it, what you can't do with standart (struts without EL) tags? What do you
> need EL for?
>
> Regards
> Leon :-)
How about "I want to fork Struts into StrutsWork
On 7/13/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wendy Smoak wrote the following on 7/13/2005 6:14 PM:
>
> > Struts-EL gives you the ability to use expressions in the Struts tags. I
> > think it's more than a convenience... for example, how would you rewrite the
> > code above if you could n
Wendy Smoak wrote the following on 7/13/2005 6:14 PM:
Struts-EL gives you the ability to use expressions in the Struts tags. I
think it's more than a convenience... for example, how would you rewrite the
code above if you could not use an expression in the 'value' attribute?
Struts-EL tags ar
From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> is Struts-EL tag, is not it? I would prefer to use JSTL
> only. I think I can do that. But it this case, what Struts-EL is for?
> For convenience only?
Struts-EL gives you the ability to use expressions in the Struts ta
On 7/13/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> Showing side by side examples from
> >>Struts "classic",
> >>Struts-EL + JSTL 1.0, and
> >>Struts + JSP 2.0 + JSTL 1.1
> >> is on my TODO list
>
> > Does the above mean that "Stru
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 7/12/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
Does the above mean that "Struts + JSP 1.2 + JSTL 1.0" (no Struts-EL)
is not possible?
I don't know about 'possible' but JSP 1.2 includes JSTL 1.1, so why would
you want to?
http://jak
From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Showing side by side examples from
>>Struts "classic",
>>Struts-EL + JSTL 1.0, and
>>Struts + JSP 2.0 + JSTL 1.1
>> is on my TODO list
> Does the above mean that "Struts + JSP 1.2 + JSTL 1.0" (no Struts-EL)
> is not possible?
(Is this
Hi Martin,
i didn't think of the users who deleted previous posts.
Here you can find it:
http://www.mail-archive.com/user%40struts.apache.org/msg30141.html
--On Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2005 09:59 -0400 Martin Gainty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jörg
Hard to answer a reference to a previous posti
On 7/12/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> > Does the above mean that "Struts + JSP 1.2 + JSTL 1.0" (no Struts-EL)
> > is not possible?
>
> I don't know about 'possible' but JSP 1.2 includes JSTL 1.1, so why would
> you want to?
http://jakarta.apache.org/tag
the referenced info..
Vielen Danke,
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Jörg Eichhorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 4:47 AM
Subject: Re: Iterate over list in in list in form bean.
Hello,
thanks for the hint
Hello,
thanks for the hint and example. I've choosen the nested way to do this,
because i
think this makes the jsp code more readable.
I there a way to do the same using request scope?
When i do this i get an exception because the collection is not re-filled
anymore.
In my previous example th
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
Does the above mean that "Struts + JSP 1.2 + JSTL 1.0" (no Struts-EL)
is not possible?
I don't know about 'possible' but JSP 1.2 includes JSTL 1.1, so why would
you want to?
L.
--
Laurie, Open Source advocate, Java geek and novice blogger:
http://www.holoweb.net/~lau
Wendy Smoak wrote the following on 7/12/2005 7:48 PM:
From: "Rick Reumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here's an example from a demo app that I keep meaning
to post to show how it can be done using either the nested or regular
JSTL tags...
Please do! Showing side by side examples from
Struts "cl
On 7/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Rick Reumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Here's an example from a demo app that I keep meaning
> > to post to show how it can be done using either the nested or regular
> > JSTL tags...
>
> Please do! Showing side by side examples from
From: "Rick Reumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Here's an example from a demo app that I keep meaning
> to post to show how it can be done using either the nested or regular
> JSTL tags...
Please do! Showing side by side examples from
Struts "classic",
Struts-EL + JSTL 1.0, and
Struts + JSP
Wendy Smoak wrote the following on 7/12/2005 7:12 PM:
From: "Jörg Eichhorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
i have a form bean with a list property of complex object which also
contains a list of objects. When iterating over the first list and using
indexed elements, then values of the first list are trans
From: "Jörg Eichhorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> i have a form bean with a list property of complex object which also
> contains a list of objects. When iterating over the first list and using
> indexed elements, then values of the first list are transferred back when
> submitting the form. The values o
30 matches
Mail list logo
