Re: More Convention Confusion.

2009-10-09 Thread RogerV
Greg Lindholm-2 wrote: > > > I have thought about extending the DefaultActionMapper to accept a name > parameter with a syntax sorta like: > >name="action:myAction:method:MyMethod:param:name=value" > > I think this would be a useful enhancement. (Maybe someone with more time > on > there

Re: More Convention Confusion.

2009-10-09 Thread Greg Lindholm
>From what I can tell you cannot pass extra parameters with the 'method' attribute > method="display?templateId=%{#status.index}" /> Whatever you specify for method will be taken as the method name. So it is looking for a method named "display?templateId=0" which is invalid and not found. The