Re: More OGNL Woes

2008-08-07 Thread Dave Newton
--- On Thu, 8/7/08, Zoran Avtarovski wrote: > You pass parameters to a page with a S2 tag but can¹t > retrieve them when on that page, WTF. Why bother allowing > it in the first place. You *can* retrieve them, just not in the way you want. They're added as request parameters and available via J

Re: More OGNL Woes

2008-08-07 Thread Zoran Avtarovski
Thanks to everybody who replied. But what I¹m hearing is that the OGNL implementation in Struts2 is half arsed. Musachy, if you look at the docs http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/ognl-basics.html it tells me that parameters is a named object. I tend to believe you, but how I would I know. And in t

Re: More OGNL Woes

2008-08-07 Thread Becky . L . O'Sullivan
I had the same problem, and someone pointed out to me that it does say in the s:include reference page (http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/include.html) that parameters passedvia s:include are not available on the stack. Well...it doesn't phrase it that way, but that's basically it. Yes, it's sill

Re: More OGNL Woes

2008-08-07 Thread André Cedik | GDG
You can also use a complete different approach. I've done this recently and it worked fine for me. On the jsp that has your you do the following: And in your myPage.jsp you just read the value from the stack like you'd normally do: Musachy Barroso wrote: First, that was funny. Second, a

Re: More OGNL Woes

2008-08-07 Thread Musachy Barroso
First, that was funny. Second, and this is *annoying*, "parameters" is not a named object when using the "component" tag, so I assume it is the same for "include", so instead of using "#parameters", use "parameters" which is the same as "top.parameters". musachy On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Zo