hey! one thing btw: when u say something[0] how can it be represented in set/
map as the order is not maintained?
and one more thing: *-conversion.prop does it work for a custom object in
the action class (struts2) (i.e. i had seen fromString being called but not
toString method ) any help
r
--- jvleminc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just noticed that this partial solution only started working after I had
> changed the Set of EoActivities into a List of EoActivities; this while the
> internal ones are still Sets. Seems the *-conversion.properties for only
> works for Lists...
That was
Just noticed that this partial solution only started working after I had
changed the Set of EoActivities into a List of EoActivities; this while the
internal ones are still Sets. Seems the *-conversion.properties for only
works for Lists...
jvleminc wrote:
>
> I have already found out that by u
Btw, Martin Gainty wrote me this by email:
Rick's suggestions are very helpful..
2 things would need to know
1)How will the data be represented visually.. starting with a working
example you can use Checkbox as illustrated
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/checkbox-interceptor.html
public class
Thanks for all answers so far.
I know I can wrap them in other, simpler objects; but before doing so (and
having to retouch my Javascript layer that lies on top of it :-( ), I wanted
to find out if there is a way to have Struts2 do this automatically for
me...
I have already found out that by us
Yup Maps will work also.
On Jan 8, 2008 1:57 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never used Sets, only Maps, which definitely work...
>
> As a sanity check perhaps you could try using a Map. I know you can get a
> Set
> view of a Map, so perhaps this is an alternative solution (I'm
I've never used Sets, only Maps, which definitely work...
As a sanity check perhaps you could try using a Map. I know you can get a Set
view of a Map, so perhaps this is an alternative solution (I'm not so sure
about going the other direction, however).
This would at least narrow down the problem
I'm assuming you can't change them because someone else created them? There
are still ways you can deal with the beans with sets..
1) Wrap them using the Adapter pattern. However if they are already coming
back nested and you can used the adapters/wrappers in the business layer you
could also..
2)
I know. Unfortunately i can't change my business beans anymore :-( Anyway,
any other ideas? I am trying now with a EoActivities-conversion.properties
file, containing
Element_eoActivity = com.datamat.care.bean.EoActivity
Element_eoUser = com.datamat.care.bean.EoUser
Element_eoUserAddress = com.da
At least in Struts1.1, If I'm not mistaken, you aren't going to be able to
use indexed properties like you are to set items in a Set. If you use Lists
it would be much easier to accomplish the nested collection population.
On Jan 8, 2008 1:02 PM, jvleminc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
