On 7/18/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To me, this is very confusing. Why doesn't the html:property tag perform
> the same kind of logic as JSTL does? I would think I should be able to
> just do...
>
>
>
> and not need to create a new accessor method name and the odd syntax (x) ?
Rick Reumann wrote the following on 7/14/2005 4:26 PM:
Rick Reumann wrote the following on 7/14/2005 4:20 PM:
From the FAQ I'm going to try this in my ActionForm..
public Object getStringMapped(String key) {
return map.get(key);
}
public void setStringMapped(String key, Obj
Right as rain, Rick! You also can have a getMap() method and use
map.name rather than map[1].name. There is some fairly weird code,
unfortunately, underlying all this, which makes the creation of an
ActionForm as an instrumented Map impossible. However, looking at the
code itself is very instruc
Rick Reumann wrote the following on 7/14/2005 4:20 PM:
From the FAQ I'm going to try this in my ActionForm..
public Object getStringMapped(String key) {
return map.get(key);
}
public void setStringMapped(String key, Object value) {
map.put(key, value);
}
When i
Rick Reumann wrote the following on 7/14/2005 3:17 PM:
Ok this is basic, but I'm stumped here at the moment...
Imagine a Map of Animals. (Animal has a "name" property)
map.put(new Integer(1), new Animal() );
map.put(new Integer(2), new Animal() );
In my Action form this map is in there as:
pr
5 matches
Mail list logo
