Re: model conversation scope doesn' t work as property in a base action class

is the correct use, because I don't use the ModelDriven interface. The conversation object is just called like this. It would be great if you publish your current implmentation. :-) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/model-conversation-scope-doesn%27-t-work-as-property-in-a

Re: model conversation scope doesn' t work as property in a base action class

I saw too that in your start.jsp page you used: Which I don't know if will work. Actions that implements ModelDriven interface push the model into the value stack, so you don't need to write "model.page", but only "page". I will eventually publish my current implementation... 2008/5/22, Canny

Re: model conversation scope doesn' t work as property in a base action class

I tried to change to order of the interceptors, but without any success. The model is still not set. You implemented the post-redirect-get pattern in your own implementation? Is it possible to publish your implementation? Gabriel Belingueres-2 wrote: > > I certainly did not use any of these co

Re: model conversation scope doesn' t work as property in a base action class

I certainly did not use any of these conversation implementations (I decided to write my own) but I suspect that you have defined the interceptors in the opposite order: I think you should first set to execute the defaultStack and then call the conversation interceptor. 2008/5/22, Canny Duck <[EMA