Re: ot: struts obsesed

2005-09-10 Thread Adam Hardy
i was using past tense Vic Cekvenich on 10/09/05 13:00, wrote: Looking at CVS and developer comments on the dev list I would say that by far, Struts development has never been more active by order of magnitude. 1.3 classic release is iminent (in "Struts" time). .V Adam Hardy wrote: it's just

Re: ot: struts obsesed

2005-09-10 Thread Vic Cekvenich
Looking at CVS and developer comments on the dev list I would say that by far, Struts development has never been more active by order of magnitude. 1.3 classic release is iminent (in "Struts" time). .V Adam Hardy wrote: it's just been fairly dormant. --

Re: ot: struts obsesed

2005-09-10 Thread Adam Hardy
Vic Cekvenich on 09/09/05 21:52, wrote: http://jroller.com/page/RickHigh?entry=is_struts_dead_is_struts Is he going to get over it? I wonder who the #2 framework is? As someone who has never really contributed much to struts except a few bug reports, I feel slightly out-of-place saying this,