Re: Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-08 Thread Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
-- > From: > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 2:07 PM > To: "struts-user" > Subject: Re [S2] development tool > >> I noticed the posting on training was not met with huge opposition for >> solicitation in the manner it was presented... >> My turn  :&g

Re: Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-05 Thread Dave Newton
duane5...@hotmail.com wrote: The core features of the tool are -20X faster development compared to current market alternatives What do you believe the "current market alternatives" are? -90% point and click development(business rules must be coded) I find that *highly* unlikely, but perhaps

RE: Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-05 Thread Martin Gainty
a pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > From: duane5...@hotmail.com > To: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: Re: Re [S2]

Re: Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-05 Thread duane5000
is a question of: is your glass half-full or half empty? Think big! Duane -- From: Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 2:07 PM To: "struts-user" Subject: Re [S2] development tool I noticed the posting on training was not met with huge oppo

RE: Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-05 Thread Martin Gainty
..@hotmail.com > To: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: Re [S2] development tool > Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:07:55 -0500 > > I noticed the posting on training was not met with huge opposition for > solicitation in the manner it was presented... > My turn :> > > We'

Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-05 Thread duane5000
I noticed the posting on training was not met with huge opposition for solicitation in the manner it was presented... My turn :> We've been toying with creating a development tool/methodology that encompases Struts, Spring, Hibernate, some code generation(not 1 screen at a time, but a replica