Re: ActionSupport implements Serializable

śr., 16 mar 2022 o 11:23 Britta Katzenbach napisał(a): > Hi, > > Can you please explain why ActionSupport needs to be serializable? Because you can put an action in HttpSession which accepts only serializable classes - also ExecAndWait interceptor had been using action this way, but as

ActionSupport implements Serializable

Hi, Can you please explain why ActionSupport needs to be serializable? Thanks and best regards, Britta Britta Katzenbach _ e-Mail: katzenb...@liwa.de Dr. Lippke & Dr. Wagner GmbH Nassauische Str. 25 10717 Berlin Tel./Fax: +49 30 21473

Why ActionSupport is Serializable?

Hello, Why ActionSupport is Serializable? Who wants to serialize the action? Ilya Kazakevich, Developer JetBrains Inc http://www.jetbrains.com Develop with pleasure! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr

Re: Why ActionSupport is Serializable?

I asked this question years ago and the answer I got was: There is no reason it should be Serializable. It was originally (mistakenly) created that way and because of compatibility it's too late to change it now. There is nothing magic about ActionSupport, you could always create your own custom

Re: only serializable objects into Session?

On Monday 25 August 2008 16:48:27 Dave Newton wrote: --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Stephan Schröder wrote: This seems to indicate that all the objects reachable through this object should be serializable, too?! No, only the ones you want serialized. I believe Servlet Containers such as Tomcat use

[OT] Re: only serializable objects into Session?

--- On Tue, 8/26/08, Roger wrote: On Monday 25 August 2008 16:48:27 Dave Newton wrote: --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Stephan Schröder wrote: This seems to indicate that all the objects reachable through this object should be serializable, too?! No, only the ones you want serialized. I

only serializable objects into Session?

hi, i read the other day that only Objects which implement Serializable should be put into an HttpSession. I gues this is valid for the Session in Struts2, too?! This seems to indicate that all the objects reachable through this object should be serializable, too?! That would be a problem

Re: only serializable objects into Session?

--- On Mon, 8/25/08, Stephan Schröder wrote: This seems to indicate that all the objects reachable through this object should be serializable, too?! No, only the ones you want serialized. Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: only serializable objects into Session?

This seems to indicate that all the objects reachable through this object should be serializable, too?! No, only the ones you want serialized. So properties which don't implement Serializable will just be null afterwards? What about Lists of nonserializable classes, will these be empty

[OT] Re: only serializable objects into Session?

http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Programming/serialization/ --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Stephan Schröder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Stephan Schröder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: only serializable objects into Session? To: Struts Users Mailing List user@struts.apache.org Date

serializable and exceptions

how the ModelDriven interface works, it just made my ui code cleaner, and allowed me to group a bunch of fields outside of my action. Anyways, i was wondering if changing the ModelDriven interface to require the object to implement Serializable would make sense? Because of this serializable

Re: serializable and exceptions

Yes, for my own objects, i am going to implement the serializable interface, however, the xwork class, even if i were to rewrite/replace it, i would also have to rewrite the interceptor to use the new object ... On 2/14/08, Randy Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That would be the first thing I

Re: serializable and exceptions

I wonder if making your object implement serializable will have any affect on the Xwork object. Have you tried to see what happens? Regards, Randy Burgess Sr. Web Applications Developer Nuvox Communications From: Brian Relph [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List user

[S2] Why Interceptors implements Serializable?

Hi, I've found intriguing that the Interceptor interface extends from Serializable. Why is that? I mean, if interceptors need to be stateless then there is no state to save/restore. Or is it because they are stored in application scope? Gabriel

Re: [S2] Should action class serializable?

I'm studying the org.apache.struts2.showcase.ajax.AjaxTestAction class and found that it is serializable. Why is this action class serializable? What is the special things we have with a serialized action class? On 4/26/07, Laurie Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wolverine my wrote: Hi

[S2] Should action class serializable?

Hi! How to decide if an Action class should be serializable or not? Thank you! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [S2] Should action class serializable?

600020 | Tel: +91 44 24407000 | Extn: 17123 | Fax: +91 44 24453661 | Mobile: +91 9884528587 | www.franklintempleton.com -Original Message- From: wolverine my [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:39 AM To: struts-user Subject: [S2] Should action class serializable? Hi

Re: [S2] Should action class serializable?

wolverine my wrote: Hi! How to decide if an Action class should be serializable or not? Thank you! Action classes are instantiated per-request so, unless you're doing anything special with the action instance in your own code, they don't need to be serializable. L

Re: FormFile throws Serializable exception in session scope

-11 09:45:30,000 WARN [ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/]] - Cannot serialize session attribute uploadForm for session 0556C80B681118276F9F2B02FEC497E0 java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.commons.fileupload.DeferredFileOutputStream DeferredFileOutputStream is not serializable

Re: FormFile throws Serializable exception in session scope

[ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/]] - Cannot serialize session attribute uploadForm for session 0556C80B681118276F9F2B02FEC497E0 java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.commons.fileupload.DeferredFileOutputStream DeferredFileOutputStream is not serializable in commons-fileupload before

What should I do with serializable classes?

I have several classes derived either from ValidatorForm or ActionForm. Both classes mark my derived class as serializable. I get a compiler warning about a missing serialVersionUID. Why are those classes serializable, because data transfered through a network connection? How do I have to handle

Re: What should I do with serializable classes?

Hi I have several classes derived either from ValidatorForm or ActionForm. Both classes mark my derived class as serializable. I get a compiler warning about a missing serialVersionUID. Maybe you are using non-serializable attributes. Check out the serializable guide in java's docs. Why

Re: FormFile throws Serializable exception in session scope

Ben wrote: Hi Could someone please let me know how to make FormFile work in the session scope? It always gives me Serializable exception. I need to use FormFile in session scope. FormFile is an interface, so I assume it's the particular implementation you're working with that's failing

Re: FormFile throws Serializable exception in session scope

let me know how to make FormFile work in the session scope? It always gives me Serializable exception. I need to use FormFile in session scope. FormFile is an interface, so I assume it's the particular implementation you're working with that's failing to serialize. How have you configured

FormFile throws Serializable exception in session scope

Hi Could someone please let me know how to make FormFile work in the session scope? It always gives me Serializable exception. I need to use FormFile in session scope. Thanks, Ben - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Serializable

Just a quick question. Does anybody follow any rule (personal or corporate) for when to use implements serializable on a Struts form-bean? Kind regards mc FOCUS Computing Mob: 0415 24 26 24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.focus-computing.com.au -- No virus found in this outgoing message

Re: Serializable

I wouldn't do it, unless you use distributed sessions. Having serializable forms will cause tomcat to dump everything from the session to a file, and reload it after restart. Unless you explicitely want this (user-invisible restart, but then you need to make EVERYTHING serializable) it makes

AW: Serializable

Mailing List Betreff: Re: Serializable I wouldn't do it, unless you use distributed sessions. Having serializable forms will cause tomcat to dump everything from the session to a file, and reload it after restart. Unless you explicitely want this (user-invisible restart, but then you

Re: Serializable

Hi, But (this is OT): how do you stop Tomcat from doing so? I looked in the Tomcat 5.0.x doc and just found nothing really helpful. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/manager.html If you want to stop Tomcat doing this for a webapp only put a META-INF/context.xml in your

Re: Serializable

from: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/io/Serializable.html When traversing a graph, an object may be encountered that does not support the Serializable interface. In this case the NotSerializableException will be thrown and will identify the class of the non-serializable object

Re: Serializable

://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/io/Serializable.html When traversing a graph, an object may be encountered that does not support the Serializable interface. In this case the NotSerializableException will be thrown and will identify the class of the non-serializable object. ATTA On 9/30/05

Re: Serializable

On 9/30/05, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure it is a stupid question... I guess this enters the realm of generic Java question, but I can't say I've ever thought about this before... what happens if you have a class that implements serializable, and you then extend

Re: Not serializable

. private static final long serialVersionUID = 2897987282761L; Any suggestions? Add implements Serializable to the class declaration (it's an empty flag interface)? HTH, --Amos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Not serializable

Hi all Caused by: java.io.NotSerializableException: com.bpx.website.model.User I keep getting this error when I try putting a User bean into the session. I tried adding a versionUID to the class but this didn't seem to help. private static final long serialVersionUID = 2897987282761L;