Re: dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-05-08 Thread tom tom
dojo 1.1 Grid looks very good, but it is still under dojox project, because of that we are thinking twice How flexible the YUI datagrid and how about the integration with Struts 2, Is that grid in beta like dojo grid or ready for production support Thanks, --- Jeromy Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-05-08 Thread Jeromy Evans
tom tom wrote: dojo 1.1 Grid looks very good, but it is still under dojox project, because of that we are thinking twice How flexible the YUI datagrid and how about the integration with Struts 2, Is that grid in beta like dojo grid or ready for production support Thanks, The YUI datagrid

Re: dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-05-06 Thread Jeromy Evans
tom tom wrote: Thanks Jeromy, Is there any reason why YUI datagrid instead of dojo 1.1 grid, Isn't it risky to depend on YUI datagrid, Thanks Moving to YUI datagrid is no riskier than moving to Dojo 1.1. They're both good libraries. Dojo 1.1 is very different than 0.4 but not as

Re: dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-05-05 Thread tom tom
Thanks Jeromy, If we use direct dojo calls (dojo 1.1) without using struts ajax tags, Will there be any issues linking these components with server side Struts Action and form classes, e.g if I have a dojo 1.1 Grib will I be able to utilize the serverside struts action classes, are there any

Re: dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-05-05 Thread Jeromy Evans
tom tom wrote: Thanks Jeromy, If we use direct dojo calls (dojo 1.1) without using struts ajax tags, Will there be any issues linking these components with server side Struts Action and form classes, e.g if I have a dojo 1.1 Grib will I be able to utilize the serverside struts action

Re: dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-05-05 Thread tom tom
Thanks Jeromy, Is there any reason why YUI datagrid instead of dojo 1.1 grid, Isn't it risky to depend on YUI datagrid, Thanks --- Jeromy Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tom tom wrote: Thanks Jeromy, If we use direct dojo calls (dojo 1.1) without using struts ajax tags, Will there

Re: dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-05-02 Thread Laurie Harper
Yes, it would, which is why Jeromy said don't use the strts2 ajax theme or tags. As long as you don't use those, the Dojo bundled with Struts wont be loaded, so there wont then be a conflict. L. tom tom wrote: Hi Jeromy, Sorry, I forgot one more question, Eventhough we use dojo 1.1

Re: dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-05-01 Thread tom tom
Thanks Jeromy, Yes that is what I also thought, On the other hand I came to know that Struts 2.1 got lot of tag enhancements with regards to dojo The main thing which I can't understand is, why struts provides AJAX theme at all, DOJO to me is not only a set of javascript, it is a

Re: dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-05-01 Thread tom tom
Hi Jeromy, Sorry, I forgot one more question, Eventhough we use dojo 1.1 directly, we need to have dojo.js, wouldn't this conflict with the one which comes as part of struts bundle --- Jeromy Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tom tom wrote: Hi, In order to leverage the full capabilities of

dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-04-30 Thread tom tom
Hi, In order to leverage the full capabilities of dojo 1.1 (latest) with the latest stable struts version. What exactlyt the best practice. The things we concerned are as followes 1) Will there be a conflict in the different dojo versions in struts 2.0.11 and dojo 1.1 2) Will it impact any

Re: dojo 1.1 in struts 2.0.11 portlets

2008-04-30 Thread Jeromy Evans
tom tom wrote: Hi, In order to leverage the full capabilities of dojo 1.1 (latest) with the latest stable struts version. What exactlyt the best practice. The things we concerned are as followes 1) Will there be a conflict in the different dojo versions in struts 2.0.11 and dojo 1.1 Yes,