Re: more on wicket

The rawInput variable is set in the FormComponent when the validation starts. If validation succeeds, rawInput is set to an internal constant and processing continues. If validation fails, the rawInput for each FormComponent is still available and is rendered on the input page. As far as adding

Re: more on wicket

Nick Heudecker wrote: I've built a number of Struts applications and consider myself an expert with it, but it's unlikely I'd build another application with Struts while Wicket is available. Nick, Wicket does look interesting, but I'm curious, how does Wicket handle preserving the user's

Re: more on wicket

> ...which are currently configured by what, XML? Doesn't this remove > some of the zero-conf advantages? And, there's going to have to be a > way to configure it in 1.2 somehow also. I guess "almost zero > configuration" isn't as catchy? :-) > There is configuration, but it's minor and contained

Re: more on wicket

ow it implements zero configuration files > > and how the URLs look freaky in the current > > version. > > > > Regards, > > David Friedman / [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of netsql &

Re: more on wicket

TED] > > -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of netsql > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 9:29 AM > To: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: ot: more on wicket > > http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t60786.html > > .V > > > ---

RE: more on wicket

EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of netsql Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 9:29 AM To: user@struts.apache.org Subject: ot: more on wicket http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/

ot: more on wicket

http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t60786.html .V - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]