Re: [struts] paramsPrepareParams vs. staticParams

2008-08-04 Thread Gabriel Belingueres
I agree that execution semantics should be preserved (in an ideal world at least). But, if the intention is to enforce security of some parameter values AND preserve action semantics, then the action should not change its behavior/semantic if we call it from the context of a different interceptor

Re: [struts] paramsPrepareParams vs. staticParams

2008-08-03 Thread Dale Newfield
Gabriel Belingueres wrote: Unless you put also those two kind of static parameters in your action, then I think staticParams should need to be executed only once. In any place where you have staticParams and/or actionMappingParams, I would expect the semantics of the action (and potentially th

Re: paramsPrepareParams vs. staticParams

2008-08-03 Thread Gabriel Belingueres
> http://www.nabble.com/about-paramsPrepareParamsStack-td15462644.html >> >> Martin >> > > Thanks. This is useful info and I missed the other thread when I searched > earlier. I'm disappointed to see that I will have to refactor stuff > (struts.xml) when I shift

RE: paramsPrepareParams vs. staticParams

2008-08-03 Thread Andy Law
Martin > Thanks. This is useful info and I missed the other thread when I searched earlier. I'm disappointed to see that I will have to refactor stuff (struts.xml) when I shift to 2.1.x when if they were included correctly (IMHO) in the pPP stack that gets distributed, I wouldn'

Re: paramsPrepareParams vs. staticParams

2008-08-03 Thread Musachy Barroso
ined in the action configuration XML and specified as non-mutable would >> not be overwritten by clever folk sticking >> '?paramname=value¶m2name=value2' at the end of any given URL) >> >> Later, >> >> Andy >>

RE: paramsPrepareParams vs. staticParams

2008-08-03 Thread Martin Gainty
ribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission. > Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:59:57 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: paramsPrepareParams vs. staticParams > >

Re: paramsPrepareParams vs. staticParams

2008-08-01 Thread Gabriel Belingueres
'?paramname=value¶m2name=value2' at the end of any given URL) > > Later, > > Andy > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/paramsPrepareParams-vs.-staticParams-tp18773842p18773842.html > Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.

paramsPrepareParams vs. staticParams

2008-08-01 Thread Andy Law
and specified as non-mutable would not be overwritten by clever folk sticking '?paramname=value¶m2name=value2' at the end of any given URL) Later, Andy -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/paramsPrepareParams-vs.-staticParams-tp18773842p18773842.html Sent from the Str