[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't have seen that. Thanks, Jeromy. It's disturbing to see this
kind of code in 2008 and makes me wonder what other antipatterns might
exist in the struts2 codebase.
Actually I only linked to that discussion to show that Dave had been
courteous enough to fo
--- Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am confused here. You do know that you don't need to
> extend/implement any class/interface right? Or I am missing the whole
> point.
The original issue was regarding error messages and how they're stored in the
action rather than in a thread/inst
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 3. Classes can't stand on their own.
Neither can a class that's using a static method.
> 4. It's easier for Java beginners to mix business logic with
> MVC framework code.
Easier? Like... typing is actually easier with S2?
Never mind, I don't get that one, and th
I am confused here. You do know that you don't need to
extend/implement any class/interface right? Or I am missing the whole
point.
musachy
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:39 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Funny; I was thinking the same thing about the static context stuff in
> JSF
> >that makes
>Funny; I was thinking the same thing about the static context stuff in
JSF
>that makes it really difficult to test in isolation.
What makes you think that's difficult? I'm sure you're aware of mock
objects. There are a number of mock JSF test frameworks---JMock and Shale
come to mind. Writing
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wouldn't have seen that. Thanks, Jeromy. It's disturbing to see this
> kind of code in 2008 and makes me wonder what other antipatterns might
> exist in the struts2 codebase.
Funny; I was thinking the same thing about the static context stuff in JSF
that makes it
I wouldn't have seen that. Thanks, Jeromy. It's disturbing to see this
kind of code in 2008 and makes me wonder what other antipatterns might
exist in the struts2 codebase.
Dave Newton wrote:
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I'm curious why the developers of struts2 chose to define const
Strangely it first freezes my browser. Re-testing it now and it's working.
I also thought the three dots could come from a shortened url, while
it's effectively not.
Apologies.
Maxx
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
--- Jeromy Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maxx wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Jeromy Evans
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/StrutsStatics...-td15595866.html
> > Just to let you know this link does not work (seems incomplete).
> Works for me in FF and IE6 a
Maxx wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Jeromy Evans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just thought I'd mention that Dave followed this up for you in struts-dev:
http://www.nabble.com/StrutsStatics...-td15595866.html
Just to let you know this link does not work (seems incomplete).
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Jeromy Evans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just thought I'd mention that Dave followed this up for you in struts-dev:
> http://www.nabble.com/StrutsStatics...-td15595866.html
Just to let you know this link does not work (seems incomplete).
---
Dave Newton wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious why the developers of struts2 chose to define constants in an
interface (StrutsStatics) and then implement that interface in at least 18
classes
Just thought I'd mention that Dave followed this up for you in struts-dev:
http:/
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm curious why the developers of struts2 chose to define constants in an
> interface (StrutsStatics) and then implement that interface in at least 18
> classes
It's likely you'd need to ask the original WebWork developers.
Item #17, "Use interfaces only to define
Hi,
I'm curious why the developers of struts2 chose to define constants in an
interface (StrutsStatics) and then implement that interface in at least 18
classes (see
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/struts2-core/apidocs/org/apache/struts2/StrutsStatics.html).
The"interface constant" pattern has b
14 matches
Mail list logo
