Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?

2013-02-21 Thread Chris Mawata
Thanks for checking guys! Chris Yep, sure enough--interesting. I think I'll start spinning through the docs and updating some stuff; that was my claim to fame at one point--need to earn those stripes. Dave On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.orgwrote:

valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?

2013-02-18 Thread Chris Mawata
Hi all, I am using Struts 2.3.4.1 and i noticed the notation [n].parameterName to get a parameter of a given name when the first ocurrance is not the one you want is not working. I can't find any documentation that it was removed. Can anyone point me to something? I might not be searching by

Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?

2013-02-18 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/2/18 Chris Mawata chris.maw...@gmail.com: Hi all, I am using Struts 2.3.4.1 and i noticed the notation [n].parameterName to get a parameter of a given name when the first ocurrance is not the one you want is not working. I can't find any documentation that it was removed. Can anyone

Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?

2013-02-18 Thread Dave Newton
The [0].foo notation should allow direct access to the nth item on the stack. I'm not aware of it intentionally going away, but I also don't use it regularly and would need to check. Dave On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.orgwrote: 2013/2/18 Chris Mawata

Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?

2013-02-18 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
There is a good chance that this notation went away after S2-009 ( http://goo.gl/NydYr), though I could be wrong . Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara VisualizeMe:

Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?

2013-02-18 Thread Dave Newton
A brief look made me think [\d] was still allowed, but I also didn't play with it to actually find out. Dave On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.orgwrote: There is a good chance that this notation went away after S2-009 ( http://goo.gl/NydYr), though I

Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?

2013-02-18 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Looking at the regex on the bottom of the page, I'd say: it's no more allowed (http://goo.gl/oUlb6 click on the green button to test the regex pattern). But the regex could not represent the right behaviour, and I also didn't test it. Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+

Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?

2013-02-18 Thread Dave Newton
Yep, sure enough--interesting. I think I'll start spinning through the docs and updating some stuff; that was my claim to fame at one point--need to earn those stripes. Dave On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.orgwrote: Looking at the regex on the bottom