Re: [S2.2.1] Javassist dependency

Reposting just for future reference 2010/8/18 Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com: Oh, you're right, it says it's provided. Which confuses me even more :/ On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: 2010/8/18 Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com: Hmm, I

Re: [S2.2.1] Javassist dependency

What, to prove to historians that I'm usually confused?! On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: Reposting just for future reference 2010/8/18 Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com: Oh, you're right, it says it's provided. Which confuses me even more

Re: [S2.2.1] Javassist dependency

W dniu 18 sierpnia 2010 15:17 użytkownik Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com napisał: What, to prove to historians that I'm usually confused?! Just to put it on the list. If you didn't notice, I answered directly to you ;-) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła