Re: Connector issue

2019-11-28 Thread Andrea Patricelli
Hi Steven, glad to hear this. Best regards, Andrea Il 28/11/19 16:15, Steven van der Merwe ha scritto: Hi Andrea Thank you very much - You are spot on. It was the fact that it was expecting an array but I was accidentally passing back an array of arrays It seems that it is all working

Re: Connector issue

2019-11-28 Thread Steven van der Merwe
Hi Andrea Thank you very much - You are spot on. It was the fact that it was expecting an array but I was accidentally passing back an array of arrays It seems that it is all working now and propagating correctly. Thank you all very much for your help, it is very much appreciated Regards

Re: Connector issue

2019-11-28 Thread Andrea Patricelli
Hi Steven, the error that you are experiencing is quite generic. But usually means that the key that you passed from Syncope is not matching the key of the object that the connector framework retrieved with the query method. As "not matching" I mean that the EqualsFilter [1] (or

Re: Connector issue

2019-11-26 Thread Steven van der Merwe
Hi I managed to work out why it was not propagating the __UID__ - It turns out I had the config for the "mapping" the wrong way around. I have now moved a bit further forward but I am stuck on the following java.lang.IllegalStateException: Object {Uid=Attribute: {Name=__UID__,

Re: Connector issue

2019-11-25 Thread Steven van der Merwe
Hi I am still a little confused for the following reason. In my search method there is no __UID__ anywhere am I missing something? For context my executeQuery looks like this (my log function uses recursion to print out all of the values) @Override public void executeQuery( final

Re: Connector issue

2019-11-25 Thread Steven van der Merwe
Perfect - thank you very much I will try Regards Steve On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:05 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > On 25/11/19 09:47, Steven van der Merwe wrote: > > Hi Francesco > > Thank you very much for your reply - I think you have hit on the problem. > > Based on your response I

Re: Connector issue

2019-11-25 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 25/11/19 09:47, Steven van der Merwe wrote: > Hi Francesco > > Thank you very much for your reply - I think you have hit on the problem. > > Based on your response I think it is definitely the read logic that is the > problem since CREATE -> Creates, UPDATE -> Creates, DELETE -> NOT_ATTEMPTED.

Re: Connector issue

2019-11-25 Thread Steven van der Merwe
Hi Francesco Thank you very much for your reply - I think you have hit on the problem. Based on your response I think it is definitely the read logic that is the problem since CREATE -> Creates, UPDATE -> Creates, DELETE -> NOT_ATTEMPTED. My problem is that I do not want to read from the

Re: Connector issue

2019-11-24 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi Steve, first of all, thanks for your words, they're highly appreciated. Coming to your issue below, I believe the problem is either related to your mapping configuration or Connector's READ implementation. Having [1] as background, propagation to an External Resource works as follows: CREATE