Re: Syncope 3.0.5 upgrade

2023-10-25 Thread Thomas Ryman
Also is there any way to encrypt the keymaster.password=unencrypted-password 
and decrypt it during run time?

From: Thomas Ryman 
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 4:43 PM
To: user@syncope.apache.org 
Subject: Syncope 3.0.5 upgrade

Hello,

I am working on upgrading syncope from version 2 to version 3 however am having 
some issues.  I am following instructions that were found before however it 
seems whenever I start syncope the logs show that I am missing a class and 
possibly some properties.  Here is one of the current errors that I am 
investigating.  Also if there is any full documentation out there on the proper 
process to upgrade from version 2 to version 3 a link would be very appreciated.

Description: Field serviceOps in 
org.apache.syncope.common.keymaster.client.api.startstop.KeymasterStartStop 
required a bean of type 
'org.apache.syncope.common.keymaster.client.api.ServiceOps' that could not be 
found. The injection point has the following annotations: - 
@org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired(required=true) Action: 
Consider defining a bean of type 
'org.apache.syncope.common.keymaster.client.api.ServiceOps' in your 
configuration.


Syncope 3.0.5 upgrade

2023-10-25 Thread Thomas Ryman
Hello,

I am working on upgrading syncope from version 2 to version 3 however am having 
some issues.  I am following instructions that were found before however it 
seems whenever I start syncope the logs show that I am missing a class and 
possibly some properties.  Here is one of the current errors that I am 
investigating.  Also if there is any full documentation out there on the proper 
process to upgrade from version 2 to version 3 a link would be very appreciated.

Description: Field serviceOps in 
org.apache.syncope.common.keymaster.client.api.startstop.KeymasterStartStop 
required a bean of type 
'org.apache.syncope.common.keymaster.client.api.ServiceOps' that could not be 
found. The injection point has the following annotations: - 
@org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired(required=true) Action: 
Consider defining a bean of type 
'org.apache.syncope.common.keymaster.client.api.ServiceOps' in your 
configuration.


Re: empty statuses in LogicActions.afterUpdate

2023-10-25 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò

So let me summarize what is happening.

This step:

- update the user so that the approval is needed

is actually performed by calling

PATCH /users/self/

or

PATCH /users/

depending on whether the caller is the user themselveers or an administrator.
Both invocations reach up to UserLogic#doUpdate that is where any matching 
LogicActions#afterUpdate is invoked.

If the update as above is triggering an approval in the defined user workflow, 
any propagation is suspended.

This step:

- approve the update

(I assume performed via Console) is instead calling

POST /flowable/userRequests/forms/

As you can see from Swagger UI, this all is returning all the propagation 
statuses as expected.

Hence, if you want to decorate the result of a form approval - similarly to 
what you are doing via LogicActions#afterUpdate for plain updates - you will 
have to code this into a workflow task, to be inserted in your definition right 
after approval.

Hope this clarifies.
Regards.

On 24/10/23 09:48, Lionel SCHWARZ wrote:

Hi Francesco,
Thanks for your answer.

You should be able to reproduce this with the UserWorkflow defined in the fit 
part of Syncope (which I used as a base for my customized workflow definition) 
and with the LogicActions implementation attached to the email:

- declare the ExampleLogicAction in the default realm
- create a user in the default realm with a resource
- update the user so that the approval is needed
- approve the update
- check in the log that the afterUdate() receives empty List

AND
- update the user so that the approval is NOT needed
- check in the log that the afterUdate() receives List with 
1 item: the propagation of the resource


Best regards
Lionel

- Le 24 Oct 23, à 8:44, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org a écrit :


Hi Lionel,
can you provide a simple project that reproduces this issue?

It should be enough to create a new Maven project from latest stable version
(3.0.5 at this time), change the workflow definition to match your case and
finally provide the steps to reproduce in embedded mode.

Regards.

On 23/10/23 18:10, Lionel SCHWARZ wrote:

To be more specific about the issue, I must tell that I have a flowable
UserWorkflow with approval on user update operations (on certain
circumstances).
It seems that when the update needs approval, the afterUpdate() is called before
approval with an empty List.
When the update does not need approval, the afterUpdate() works fine.

Lionel

- Le 23 Oct 23, à 17:36, Lionel SCHWARZ lionel.schw...@in2p3.fr a écrit :


Dear all,

I have a customized LogicAction with afterUpdate() implementation, but this
method receives an empty List when called.
Nevertheless, the propagation works fine, and I get the correct REST response
with propagationStatuses and beforeObg/afterObj.

Am I missing something?

Regards
Lionel


--
Francesco Chicchiriccò

Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/

Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/